Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry data

Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Insufficiently Controlled by Metformin

Short name GetGoal-M-Asia

NCTNCT01169779 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other idEFC11321Other idU1111-1116-8938

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
391 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Sanofi · Industry
Design
Randomized · Double masking
Countries
4 countries

China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Thailand

Start
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
First posted
26 Jul 2010 (estimated)
Last update posted
13 Oct 2016 (estimated)
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201020112012
  1. Ph 3

    GetGoal-M-Asia

    NCT01169779

    Jul 2010 to Dec 2011

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010) in comparison to placebo, as an add-on treatment to metformin with or without sulfonylurea, over a period of 24 weeks of treatment. The primary objective is to assess the effects on glycemic control of lixisenatide (AVE0010) in comparison to placebo as an add-on treatment to metformin with or without sulfonylurea in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction (absolute change) at Week 24. The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide over 24 weeks on percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than (\< ) 7 percent (%) or HbA1c less than or equal to (\<=) 6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and glucose excursion during standardized meal test, body weight; to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) and anti-lixisenatide antibody development.

Interventions

  • Lixisenatide (AVE0010)Drug
  • PlaceboDrug
  • Pen auto-injectorDevice
  • MetforminDrug
  • SulfonylureaDrug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    Lixisenatide

    1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide: 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) for 2 weeks, followed by 20 mcg QD up to Week 24.

  • Placebo comparator

    Placebo

    1-step initiation regimen of volume matching placebo: 10 mcg QD for 2 weeks, followed by 20 mcg QD up to Week 24.

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Secondary outcomes(7)
  1. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  2. Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.

  3. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  4. Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

    Time frame · Week 24

    Registry description

    The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  5. Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

    Time frame · Week 24

    Registry description

    The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  6. Change From Baseline in Glucose Excursion at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the standardized meal test, before study drug administration. Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest.

  7. Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period

    Time frame · Baseline up to Week 24

    Registry description

    Routine fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG \>250 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (13.9 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG \>220 mg/dL (12.2 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG \>200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c \>8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

GroupValue (percentage of hemoglobin)Spread
Placebo-0.470.104
Lixisenatide-0.830.102
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

GroupValue (mmol/L)Spread
Placebo-0.210.200
Lixisenatide-0.690.197
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24

GroupValue (mmol/L)Spread
Placebo-1.330.376
Lixisenatide-5.610.393
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

GroupValue (kilogram)Spread
Placebo-1.240.273
Lixisenatide-1.500.267
Secondary outcomeNumber· Week 24

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Placebo38.8
Lixisenatide53.0
Secondary outcomeNumber· Week 24

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Placebo18.1
Lixisenatide32.4
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in Glucose Excursion at Week 24

GroupValue (mmol/L)Spread
Placebo-0.790.340
Lixisenatide-4.780.356
Other pre specified outcomeNumber· Baseline, Week 24

Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Placebo14.7
Lixisenatide19.7

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Placebo1-step initiation regimen of volume matching placebo.–4 / 19446 / 194
Lixisenatide1-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.–3 / 19680 / 196

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies2

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

1 study on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2014

11 results

Lixisenatide treatment improves glycaemic control in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin with or without sulfonylurea: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial (GetGoal-M-Asia).

Yu Pan et al. 2014Diabetes/metabolism research and reviewscited by 63

PMID 24639432DOI 10.1002/dmrr.2541PUB-24639432

Full text at the publisher11 results

More studies

1 study on this page

PubMed tag: none · 2016

Lixisenatide improves glycemic outcomes of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.

Seino et al. 2016Diabetology & metabolic syndromecited by 6

PMID 27252787PMC4888474DOI 10.1186/s13098-016-0151-7PUB-27252787

CC BY
Download PDF

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion criteria: \- Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year before screening visit, insufficiently controlled with metformin alone or metformin with sulfonylurea at the time of the screening visit Exclusion criteria: * HbA1c \<7% or greater than (\>) 10% at screening * At the time of screening age \< legal age of majority * Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method * Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Treatment with metformin not at a stable dose of at least 1.0 gram per day or more than 1.5 gram per day for at least 3 months prior to screening visit * In case of treatment with sulfonylurea, if the sulfonylurea dosage is less than the maximum effective dose (that is, half of the maximum recommended dose according to local labeling), or is not at a stable (unchanged) dose for at least 3 months prior to screening * FPG at screening \>250 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (\>13.9 millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) * History of hypoglycemia unawareness * Body mass index \<=20 kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2) * Weight change of \>5 kg during the 3 months preceding the screening visit * History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery, or inflammatory bowel disease or patients considered by the investigator at high risk for acute pancreatitis (for example, with known history of biliary gallstone\[s\], or with very high triglyceride level \[\>=5.65 mmol/L\]) at the time of screening * Personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer or genetic conditions that predispose to medullary thyroid cancer (for example, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes); * History of metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis within 1 year prior to screening * Hemoglobinopathy or hemolytic anemia, receipt of blood or plasma products within 3 months prior to the time of screening * Within the last 6 months prior to screening: history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure requiring hospitalization * Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to the time of screening * Cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine disease, active malignant tumor or other major systemic disease or patients with short life expectancy making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult, history or presence of clinically significant diabetic retinopathy, history or presence of macular edema likely to require laser treatment within the study period * Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension at the time of screening with a resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or \>95 mmHg, respectively * Laboratory findings at the time of screening: amylase and/or lipase: \>3 times upper limit of normal (ULN); hemoglobin \<11 gram/deciliter and/or neutrophils \<1500 per cubic millimeter (mm\^3) and/or platelets \<100 000/mm\^3; calcitonin \>20 picogram per milliliter (5.9 picomole per liter) ; and positive test for Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody * Any clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, or vital signs at the time of screening that, in the judgment of the investigator or any sub-investigator, precludes safe completion of the study or constrains efficacy assessment * Patients who are considered by the investigator or any sub-investigator as inappropriate for this study for any reason (for example, impossibility to meet specific protocol requirements, such as attending scheduled visits, being able to do self-injections; likelihood of requiring treatment during the screening phase and treatment phase with drugs not permitted by the clinical study protocol; investigator or any sub-investigator, pharmacist, study coordinator, other study staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol) * Use of oral or injectable antidiabetic or hypoglycemic agents other than metformin and sulfonylurea (for example, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, thiazolidinedione, glucagon-like peptide -1 \[GLP-1\], receptor agonist, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors, insulin) within 3 months prior to the time of screening * Use of systemic glucocorticoids (excluding topical application or inhaled forms) for 1 week or more within 3 months prior to the time of screening * Use of any investigational drug within 3 months prior to screening; * Participation in a previous study with lixisenatide * Renal impairment defined with creatinine \>1.4 mg/dL in women and creatinine \>1.5 mg/dL in men * Clinically relevant history of gastrointestinal disease associated with prolonged nausea and vomiting, including, but not limited to gastroparesis, unstable (that is, worsening) and not controlled (that is, prolonged nausea and vomiting) gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring medical treatment, within 6 months prior to the time of screening * Allergic reaction to any GLP-1 agonist in the past (for example, exenatide, liraglutide) or to metacresol * Additional exclusion criteria at the end of the run-in phase: informed consent withdrawal; lack of compliance during the single-blind placebo run-in phase (\>2 injections missed); and patient with any adverse event which precludes the inclusion in the study, as assessed by the investigator

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.