Severity of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) as Compared to the Severity of ROP in an Untreated Control Population
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 14 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 24 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry dataUnited States, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
To compare the severity of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) among treated infants with an untreated control population, matched for gestational age at birth while confirming the dose of rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 is safe and efficacious.
Active comparator
rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3
Continuous IV Infusion
No intervention
Control
The comparator group will receive no treatment with rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Severity of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) as Compared to the Severity of ROP in an Untreated Control Population
Time frame · End of study
ROP was measured by central exams with fundus photography. Maximum severity of ROP stage across all retinal examinations included International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, a 5 stage system, for the classification of ROP with 7 different outcomes of the ROP stage in each retinal examination: 0, 1, 2, 3, 3+, 4, and 5. This is an ordinal scale with higher numbers indicating a more severe outcome. The maximum severity of ROP across all time points was assessed from 31 PMA weeks up to 40 PMA Weeks +/- 4 days (end of study).
Time to Discharge From Neonatal Intensive Care (TDNIC)
Time frame · Day 0 to 40 Weeks Post Menstrual Age (EOS)
Number of Participants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)
Time frame · At 36 Weeks Post Menstrual Age
Severity of BPD as mild, moderate and severe were based on the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) guidelines for preterm infants born at gestational age (GA) less than (\<) 32 weeks. Mild: oxygen requirement during the first 28 days but in room air at PMA 36 weeks or discharge to home, whichever comes first. Moderate BPD: oxygen requirement during the first 28 days and oxygen \<30 percent (%) at PMA 36 weeks or discharge to home, whichever comes first. Severe BPD: oxygen requirement during the first 28 days and oxygen greater than equal (≥)30% through head hood or nasal canula, or continuous positive airway pressure, or mechanical ventilation, or high flow nasal cannula ≥2 L/min at PMA 36 weeks or discharge to home, whichever comes first.
Rate of Change in Body Weight
Time frame · Day 0 to 40 Weeks Post Menstrual Age (EOS)
The rate of change is the rate of specific body weight change per day in kilogram (kg).
Rate of Change in Length
Time frame · Day 0 to 40 Weeks Post Menstrual Age (EOS)
The rate of change is the length change per day in centimeter (cm).
Rate of Change in Head Circumference
Time frame · Day 0 to 40 Weeks Post Menstrual Age (EOS)
The rate of change is the head circumference change per day in centimetre (cm).
Brain Development Assessed by Brain Volume at 40 Weeks PMA/EOS
Time frame · 40 Weeks PMA/ (EOS) +/- 4 days
Brain volume was measured using cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Brain volume included cerebrospinal volume, gray matter volume, white matter volume, and total cerebellar volume
Percentage of Participants With Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH)
Time frame · Day 0 to 40 Weeks Post Menstrual Age (EOS)
Development of intraventricular hemorrhage was assessed by cerebral ultrasound and coded as a binary endpoint (presence or absence of IVH).
Area Under Curve for Maximum Severity of ROP Stage (AUC for ROP)
Time frame · Every 1-2 weeks starting at 31 weeks PMA/ EOS +/- 4 days
Integration of the maximum severity of ROP stage and the duration of the time interval with respect to each retinal examination. AUC for the maximum severity of ROP was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The area between each 2 visits was calculated by multiplying the average of the maximum severities of the 2 visits by the difference in days and analyzed using the van Elteren test. ROP is classified according to the International Classification and is subdivided into 5 stages (1-5) with higher values representing greater severity.
Percentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of ROP Stage Greater Than or Equal to 3 at Any Time During the Study
Time frame · Day 0 to 40 Weeks Post Menstrual Age (EOS)
ROP was measured by central exams with fundus photography. Maximum severity of ROP stage across all retinal examinations included International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, a 5 stage system, for the classification of ROP with 7 different outcomes of the ROP stage in each retinal examination: 0, 1, 2, 3, 3+, 4, and 5. This is an ordinal scale with higher numbers indicating a more severe outcome.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Event (TESAE)
Time frame · Day 0 to 40 Weeks Post Menstrual Age (EOS)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent adverse event was defined as the onset of any AE or if the severity of a pre-existing AE worsened any time on or after the date of first dose of investigational product.
Percentage of Serum IGF-1 Concentrations Falling Within Target Range After Infusion of rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3
Time frame · Day 0 to 40 Weeks Post Menstrual Age (EOS)
Serum samples were collected from treated and control participants for quantification of IGF-1 using validated immunoassays. Target range of serum IGF-1 was 28-109 mcg/L. The percentage of serum IGF-1 levels across treated participants that fall within the range was reported.
Serum Concentrations of IGFBP-3 After Intravenous (IV) Infusion of rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3
Time frame · Day 0 and Week 40 Post Menstrual Age
Serum Concentrations of Acid Labile Sub-unit (ALS) After Intravenous (IV) Infusion of rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3
Time frame · Day 7 and Week 40 Post Menstrual Age
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 14 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 24 |
| Group | Value (Days) |
|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 82.00 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 74.00 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 4 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 4 |
| Group | Value (kilogram per day (kg/day)) |
|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 0.021 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 0.023 |
| Group | Value (centimeter per day (cm/day)) |
|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 0.141 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 0.156 |
| Group | Value (cm/day) |
|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 0.115 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 0.119 |
| Group | Value (cubic centimeter) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 87.94 | 26.788 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 93.70 | 25.540 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 | 19.67 |
| Standard of Care (Control) | 30.0 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3Participants received rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 250 mcg/kg for 24 hours through continuous IV infusion from Day 0 up to 29 weeks 6 days of PMA. | – | 48 / 61 | 58 / 61 |
| Standard of Care (Control)Participants in this control group do not received any treatment other than the standard care. | – | 37 / 60 | 60 / 60 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
2 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2019
Ley et al. 2019The Journal of pediatricscited by 124
PMID 30471715PMC6389415DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.10.033PUB-30471715
Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2013
Ley et al. 2013Pediatric researchcited by 54
PMID 23095978PMC4028624DOI 10.1038/pr.2012.146PUB-23095978
3 studies on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2020
Klevebro et al. 2020Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Societycited by 14
PMID 31756675PMC7054155DOI 10.1016/j.ghir.2019.11.001PUB-31756675
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017
Chung et al. 2017Pediatric researchcited by 14
PMID 27870826DOI 10.1038/pr.2016.255PUB-27870826
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017
Hansen-Pupp et al. 2017Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Societycited by 21
PMID 28934640DOI 10.1016/j.ghir.2017.08.004PUB-28934640
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated