Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry data

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Lixisenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes for Glycemic Control and Safety Evaluation, on Top of Basal Insulin

Short name GETGOAL-L

NCTNCT00715624 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other idEFC6016Other id2007-005886-36

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
496 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Sanofi · Industry
Design
Randomized · Quadruple masking
Countries
15 countries

United States, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Italy, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Russia, South Korea, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Start
Jul 2008
Primary completion
Feb 2011
Completion
Feb 2011
First posted
15 Jul 2008 (estimated)
Last update posted
28 Nov 2016 (estimated)
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
20082009201020112012
  1. Ph 3

    GETGOAL-L

    NCT00715624

    Jul 2008 to Feb 2011

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010), in comparison to placebo, as an add-on treatment to basal insulin with or without metformin over a period of 24 weeks of treatment, followed by an extension. The primary objective is to assess the effects of lixisenatide when added to basal insulin on glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction at Week 24. The secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide when added to basal insulin on body weight, 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) after standardized meal challenge test, percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than 7 percent (%), percentage of patients reaching HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), change in 7-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles, change in basal insulin and total insulin doses; to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-lixisenatide antibody development.

Interventions

  • Lixisenatide (AVE0010)Drug
  • PlaceboDrug
  • Basal InsulinDrug
  • MetforminDrug
  • Pen auto-injectorDevice

Arms2

  • Experimental

    Lixisenatide

    2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide: 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to the end of treatment.

  • Placebo comparator

    Placebo

    2-step initiation regimen of volume matching placebo: 10 mcg QD for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to the end of treatment.

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Secondary outcomes(8)
  1. Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to last dosing day of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  2. Change From Baseline in Average 7-Point Self Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Patients recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime once in a week and the average value for the 7-time points was calculated. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to last dosing day of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  3. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  4. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  5. Change From Baseline in Total Insulin Dose at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline, Week 24

    Registry description

    Change was calculated for total insulin dose by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to last dosing day of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  6. Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

    Time frame · Week 24

    Registry description

    The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  7. Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

    Time frame · Week 24

    Registry description

    The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

  8. Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period

    Time frame · Baseline up to Week 24

    Registry description

    Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG \>270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG \>240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG \>200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c \> 8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

GroupValue (percentage of hemoglobin)Spread
Placebo-0.380.107
Lixisenatide-0.740.090
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24

GroupValue (mmol/L)Spread
Placebo-1.720.543
Lixisenatide-5.540.468
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in Average 7-Point Self Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles at Week 24

GroupValue (mmol/L)Spread
Placebo-0.610.238
Lixisenatide-1.490.201
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

GroupValue (mmol/L)Spread
Placebo-0.550.281
Lixisenatide-0.630.233
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

GroupValue (kilogram)Spread
Placebo-0.520.293
Lixisenatide-1.800.246
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline, Week 24

Change From Baseline in Total Insulin Dose at Week 24

GroupValue (units per day)Spread
Placebo-1.931.589
Lixisenatide-5.621.317
Secondary outcomeNumber· Week 24

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Placebo12.0
Lixisenatide28.3
Secondary outcomeNumber· Week 24

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Placebo3.8
Lixisenatide14.5

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Placebo2-step initiation regimen of volume matching placebo.–17 / 167104 / 167
Lixisenatide2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide.–46 / 328245 / 328

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies4

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

3 studies on this page

PubMed tag: none · 2023

2 results

Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Duration on the Efficacy and Safety of Add-on Lixisenatide in Asian Individuals Receiving Basal Insulin: A Pooled Analysis.

Yao et al. 2023Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders

PMID 36809495PMC10064411DOI 10.1007/s13300-023-01369-6PUB-36809495

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC2 results

PubMed tag: none · 2020

2 results

Achieving postprandial glucose control with lixisenatide improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes on basal insulin: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data.

Davidson et al. 2020Clinical diabetes and endocrinologycited by 5

PMID 31956422PMC6961286DOI 10.1186/s40842-019-0088-5PUB-31956422

CC BY2 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013

10 results

Adding once-daily lixisenatide for type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by established basal insulin: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison (GetGoal-L).

Riddle et al. 2013Diabetes carecited by 239

PMID 23628617PMC3747925DOI 10.2337/dc12-2454PUB-23628617

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND10 results

More studies

1 study on this page

Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2014

Lixisenatide plus basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.

Charbonnel et al. 2014Journal of diabetes and its complicationscited by 39

PMID 25130920DOI 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.07.007PUB-25130920

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year before screening visit, insufficiently controlled with basal insulin with or without metformin Exclusion Criteria: * HbA1c less than (\<) 7 % or greater than (\>) 10% at screening * At the time of screening age \< legal age of majority * Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method * Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Treatment with basal insulin for less than 3 months prior to screening or insulin regimen changed during the last 3 months prior to screening * Basal insulin dose at screening \<30 units/day and/or not at a stable dose (+/- 20 percent \[%\]) during the last 2 months * If treatment with metformin, no stable dose of at least 1.5 gram/day (except for South Korea: at least 1.0 gram/day) for at least 3 months prior to screening visit * FPG at screening \>250 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (\>13.9 millimole per liter \[mmol/L\]) * History of hypoglycemia unawareness * Body mass index less than or equal to (\<=) 20 kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2) * Weight change of \>5 kg during the 3 months preceding the screening visit * History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, stomach/gastric surgery, or inflammatory bowel disease * History of metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis within 1 year prior to screening * Hemoglobinopathy or hemolytic anemia, receipt of blood or plasma products within 3 months prior to the time of screening * Within the last 6 months prior to screening, history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure requiring hospitalization * Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months prior to the time of screening * Cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine disease, active malignant tumor or other major systemic disease or patients with short life expectancy making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult, history or presence of clinically significant diabetic retinopathy, history or presence of macular edema likely to require laser treatment within the study period * Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension at the time of screening with a resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or \>95 mmHg, respectively * Laboratory findings at the time of screening: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase: \>2 times upper limit of the normal (ULN) laboratory range; amylase and/or lipase: \>3 times ULN; total bilirubin: \>1.5 times ULN (except in case of Gilbert's syndrome); hemoglobin \<11 gram/deciliter and/or neutrophils \<1500 per cubic millimeter (mm\^3) and/or platelets \<100 000/mm\^3; positive test for Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody and positive serum pregnancy test in females of childbearing potential * Any clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, or vital signs at the time of screening that, in the judgment of the investigator or any sub-investigator, precludes safe completion of the study or constrains efficacy assessment * Patients who are considered by the investigator or any sub-investigator as inappropriate for this study for any reason (for example, impossibility to meet specific protocol requirements, such as attending scheduled visits, being able to do self-injections; likelihood of requiring treatment during the screening phase and treatment phase with drugs not permitted by the clinical study protocol; investigator or any sub-investigator, pharmacist, study coordinator, other study staff or relative thereof directly involved in the conduct of the protocol) * Use of other oral or injectable antidiabetic or hypoglycemic agents other than metformin or basal insulin (for example, sulfonylurea, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, thiazolidinedione, rimonabant, exenatide, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors, fast-acting insulin for 1 week or more) within 3 months prior to the time of screening * Use of systemic glucocorticoids (excluding topical application or inhaled forms) for 1 week or more within 3 months prior to the time of screening * Any previous treatment with lixisenatide or participation in any previous study with lixisenatide * Use of any investigational drug within 3 months prior to study * Renal impairment defined with creatinine \>1.4 mg/dL in women and creatinine \>1.5 mg/dL in men (applicable only for patients with metformin treatment) * End-stage renal disease as defined by a calculated serum creatinine clearance of \<15 milliliter/minute and/or patients on dialysis, if no treatment with metformin * Clinically relevant history of gastrointestinal disease associated with prolonged nausea and vomiting, including, but not limited to gastroparesis and gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring medical treatment, within the previous 6 months * History of allergic reaction to any glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist in the past (for example, exenatide, liraglutide) or to metacresol * Additional exclusion criteria at the end of the run-in phase: informed consent withdrawal; lack of compliance during the single-blind placebo run-in phase (\>2 injections missed); and patient with any adverse event which precludes the inclusion in the study, as assessed by the investigator

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.