Percentage of Participants Developing Diarrhea (Grade 1 to 4)
| Group | Value (Percentage of Participants) |
|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 76.1 |
| Standard Treatment | 78.9 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name LARCID
Brazil
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This study will evaluate the efficacy of Octreotide LAR in preventing chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (with regimens that contain 5 fluorouracil, irinotecan and capecitabine)in patients with colorectal cancer.
Experimental
Octreotide Long Acting Release
Prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Diarrhea (CID)
Other
Standard Treatment
Physician treatment of choice for chemotherapy induced diarrhea other than Octreotide LAR.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Percentage of Participants Developing Diarrhea (Grade 1 to 4)
Time frame · 6 month overall
The percentage of patients developing diarrhea (incidence of grade 1 to 4) during treatment, considering only the worst grade of diarrhea for each patient. Diarrhea was graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria where Grade 0=None, 1 = Increase of \<4 stools/day over pretreatment, Grade 2 = Increase of 4-6 stools/day, or nocturnal stools, Grade 3 = Increase of ≥7 stools/day or incontinence; or need for parenteral support for dehydration and Grade 4= Physiologic consequences requiring intensive care; or hemodynamic collapse.
Number of Episodes of Diarrhea by Patient
Time frame · 6 months overall
Number of episodes of diarrhea is evaluated by patient diaries recorded on a daily basis.
Number of Episodes of Diarrhea by Patient by Cycle
Time frame · at each cycle (28 days per cycle)
Mean number of episodes of diarrhea is evaluated by patient diaries recorded by cycle. (cycle 1 to cycle 7.)
Percentage of Patients by Grade of Diarrhea
Time frame · 6 months overall
Grade (severity) of episodes of diarrhea is evaluated by patient diaries recorded on a daily basis by considering only worse grade of diarrhea for each patient. Diarrhea was graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria where Grade 0 = None, 1 = Increase of \<4 stools/day over pretreatment, Grade 2 = Increase of 4-6 stools/day, or nocturnal stools, Grade 3 = Increase of ≥7 stools/day or incontinence; or need for parenteral support for dehydration and Grade 4= Physiologic consequences requiring intensive care; or hemodynamic collapse.
Percentage of Episodes by Grade
Time frame · 6 months overall
Grade (severity)of episodes of diarrhea is evaluated by patient diaries recorded on a daily basis by considering only worse grade of diarrhea for each patient. Diarrhea was graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria where Grade 1 = Increase of \<4 stools/day over pretreatment, Grade 2 = Increase of 4-6 stools/day, or nocturnal stools, Grade 3 = Increase of ≥7 stools/day or incontinence;or need for parenteral support for dehydration and Grade 4= Physiologic consequences requiring intensive care; or hemodynamic collapse.
Percentage of Participants Who Need Chemotherapy Dose Reduction Due to Diarrhea
Time frame · 6 months overall
For patient, chemotherapy dose reduction due to diarrhea as counted each time it occurred. Chemotherapy dose reduction because of other adverse events related to chemotherapy was not considered.
Percentage of Participants Who Need Opioids for Control of Diarrhea
Time frame · 6 months overall
Percentage of Patients Hospitalized Due to Diarrhea
Time frame · 6 months overall
Percentage of Participants Who Need Intravenous Hydration for Control of Diarrhea
Time frame · 6 months overall
Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response at Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Time frame · Day 56, Day 84, Day 112, Day 140, Day 168
Lesions that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter (LD) to be recorded) as \> 20 mm with conventional techniques (CT, MRI) or as \> 10 mm with spiral CT scan. All measurable lesions up to maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total representative of all involved organs should be identified as target lesions and recorded and measured at baseline. Complete Response is defined as Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response is defined at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Diarrhea (FACIT-D)
Time frame · Baseline to Day 168
Quality of life (QoL) is evaluated using FACIT-D scale. FACIT-D is composed of 38 items, whose responses range from 0 to 4. The total FACIT-D score may range from 0 to 152. The 38 items compose five subscales, each evaluating a different component of the (QOL). For calculating the subscale score, some items are computed in a reverse fashion, so that higher FACIT-D scores indicate a better (QoL). Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum) are used to summarize FACIT-D scores (total and subscales) by study group at each time point.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Percentage of Participants) |
|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 76.1 |
| Standard Treatment | 78.9 |
| Group | Value (Episodes/patients/day) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 21.6 | 24.3 |
| Standard Treatment | 20.4 | 19.6 |
| Group | Value (Episodes/patient/cycle) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| Standard Treatment | 2.2 | 2 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of Participants) |
|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 41.2 |
| Standard Treatment | 26.8 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of Episodes) |
|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 65.4 |
| Standard Treatment | 66.9 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 26.9 |
| Standard Treatment | 11.3 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of Participants) |
|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 1.5 |
| Standard Treatment | 1.4 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of patients) |
|---|---|
| Octreotide Long Acting Release | 6 |
| Standard Treatment | 4.2 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Octreotide LAR | – | 15 / 68 | 63 / 68 |
| Standard Treatment | – | 14 / 71 | 68 / 71 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2014
Hoff et al. 2014Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncologycited by 35
PMID 24516038DOI 10.1200/jco.2013.50.8077PUB-24516038
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated