Joint Space Width (JSW) in the Medial Tibiofemoral Knee Joint in Signal Knee Measured by X-ray After 24 Months.
| Group | Value (mm) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Active Arm | -0.188 | 0.5626 |
| Placebo Arm | -0.198 | 0.5069 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataThis trial does not test a peptide that PepBank tracks.
Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Hong Kong, Poland, Romania
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Salmon Calcitonin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT00486434May 2007 to Sept 2010
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The purpose of this Phase III study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral salmon calcitonin in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Active comparator
1
SMC021 Oral Calcitonin, 0.8 mg twice daily during 24 months
Placebo comparator
2
SMC021 Placebo, orally twice daily during 24 months
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Joint Space Width (JSW) in the Medial Tibiofemoral Knee Joint in Signal Knee Measured by X-ray After 24 Months.
Time frame · Change from baseline to 24 months
The signal knee was chosen prior to randomization based on which knee met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The JSW is the space measured in mm between the 2 bones in the knee joint and this is assessed by x-ray. The JSW decreases with disease progression. The lower limit for participation in the trial were 2 mm JSW. There were no upper limit as long as inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. The outcome was measured as a change in JSW from baseline to month 24.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscore in the Signal Knee
Time frame · Change from baseline to 24 months
WOMAC is a self-administered set of standardized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The subject marks on a scale (1-100) the pain associated with performing each daily activity listed in the questionnaire. 0 is no pain (best), 100 is extreme pain (Worst). The total function sub score for the questions are then calculated. Total possible minimum sub score is 0, maximum is 500. The final outcome is the absolute change from baseline to 24 months. If the outcome is less that 0 there is improvement (less pain).
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Subscore in the Signal Knee.
Time frame · Change from baseline to 24 months
WOMAC is a self-administered set of standardized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The subject marks on a scale (1-100) the degree of difficulty for performing each daily function listed in the questionnaire. 0 is no difficulty (best), 100 is extreme difficulty (worst). The total function sub score for the questions are then calculated. Total possible minimum sub score is 0, maximum is 1700. The final outcome is the absolute change from baseline to 24 months. If the outcome is less that 0 there is improvement (less difficulty).
Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone & Cartilage Metabolism.
Time frame · From Baseline to Month 24
The central laboratory analyzed serum CTX-I (S-Crosslaps, Elecsys) and osteocalcin as well as urine CTX-I/creatinine and CTX-II/creatinine. It was originally planned that serum CTX-II would be measured, but this was not done.
Effect on Hand Osteoarthritis (OA) Assessed by X-ray & Questionnaire From Baseline to 24 Months
Time frame · Baseline and Month 24
To assess disease progression of OA affected joints, X-rays of both hands were performed \& assessed by two central readers (at Synarc). Hand OA was assessed by calculating total score for osteophytes, cyst erosion, \& joint space narrowing, each of which were based on sum of left and right hand X-ray analysis with possible scores of 0-66. The overall total score (possible range 0-198) was also used. Higher scores (closer to 66 or to 198 when using overall total score) imply a worse outcome. Hand analyses were based on double readings, and the mean was used in the analyses. The AUStralian/CANadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) questionnaire was also used for assessment of hand OA. It measures pain (5 questions), stiffness (1 question) and difficulties with daily activities (9 questions) through a visual analogue scale (0-100mm; 0 = lowest score; 100 = highest score). Lower AUSCAN scores represent a better outcome. Change (from baseline to month 24) in these scores was calculated.
Nature and # of AEs Monitored Continuously During Study
Time frame · From Baseline to Month 24
Adverse events were by system organ class of all patients.
Disease Progression in the Knee Evaluated by MRI.
Time frame · From Baseline to Month 24
Disease progression in the signal knee (cartilage volume and thickness) were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRIs were performed for patients from the sites in Ballerup, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania using a quality controlled low-field 0.18T C-Span scanner from Esaote dedicated to the imaging of extremities. The same solenoid coil was used for all patients at a given site.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (mm) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Active Arm | -0.188 | 0.5626 |
| Placebo Arm | -0.198 | 0.5069 |
| Group | Value (Units on a scale) |
|---|---|
| Active Arm | -124.0 |
| Placebo Arm | -109.0 |
| Group | Value (Units on a scale) |
|---|---|
| Active Arm | -390.0 |
| Placebo Arm | -299.5 |
| Group | Value (percentage of change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Active Arm | 41.358 | 68.1153 |
| Placebo Arm | 62.883 | 65.7225 |
| Group | Value (Scores on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Active Arm | 0.40 | 0.784 |
| Placebo Arm | 0.40 | 0.754 |
| Group | Value (Number of AEs by system organ class) |
|---|---|
| Active Arm | 548 |
| Placebo Arm | 520 |
| Total | 1068 |
| Group | Value (percentage of change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Active Arm | 2.90 | 10.104 |
| Placebo Arm | 0.26 | 9.283 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Arm0.8mg SMC021 Oral Calcitonin tablet twice daily | – | 100 / 585 | 548 / 585 |
| Placebo Arm1 SMC021 Placebo tablet twice daily | – | 88 / 584 | 520 / 584 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2015
Karsdal et al. 2015Osteoarthritis and cartilagecited by 109
PMID 25582279DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.019PUB-25582279
2 studies on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2026
Bay-Jensen et al. 2026BMC rheumatology
PMID 41764561PMC13059256DOI 10.1186/s41927-026-00628-wPUB-41764561
PubMed tag: none · 2026
Hannani et al. 2026Arthritis research & therapy
PMID 42092979PMC13317274DOI 10.1186/s13075-026-03825-7PUB-42092979
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated