Subjects' Overall Impression After Using E-Device
| Group | Value (subjects) |
|---|---|
| Saizen® E-Device | 0 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataThis trial does not test a peptide that PepBank tracks.
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the E-Device performances and handling on the use in common practice, by collecting the impressions of patients, nurses and the investigator on the graphic interface, the instructions manual, the E-Device training and the material itself.
Experimental
Saizen® E-Device
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Subjects' Overall Impression After Using E-Device
Time frame · 2 Weeks
Subjects' overall impression after using E-Device was measured on a scale ranging from 1 to 3, where 1 = bad, 2 = good, and 3 = very good. Number of subjects with response based on overall impression scale were presented.
Usefulness and Reliability of E-Device Functions
Time frame · 2 Weeks
Following functions were assessed: Display of remaining dose in cartridge, Display of last injection date and time, Automatic needle attachment, Audible and visual signals, Dose injected confirmation, Dose history, Customizable needle insertion speed, Customizable drug insertion speed, Customizable insertion depth, Teach me menu, On screen instructions, Customizable name and picture, Pre-programmed dose and Skin sensor. Usefulness and reliability of each of the E-Device functions was measured on a scale ranging from 1 to 3, where 1 = not useful, 2 = useful, and 3 = very useful. Number of subjects with response based on usefulness and reliability scale were presented.
Subjects' Feedback Immediately After Initial Training During Inclusion Visit
Time frame · Inclusion visit (Day 1)
Subjects' feedback immediately after initial training on the handling and use of E-Device was assessed on scale ranging from 1 to 3, where 1 = difficult, 2 = easy, and 3 = very easy. Subjects were provided training on the following aspects: Cartridge loading, Needle attachment, Needle detachment, Injection process, Navigation in the menu, and Handling of the device. Number of subjects with response based on their feedback were presented.
Nurse/Physician's Feedback After E-Device Set up During Inclusion Visit
Time frame · Inclusion visit (Day 1)
Nurse/physician's feedback was assessed for E-Device setting up and Dose programming on inclusion visit using a scale ranging from 1 to 3, where 1 = difficult, 2 = easy, and 3 = very easy. Nurse/Physician's response for the number of subjects were presented.
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame · Day 1 up to Day 90
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any new untoward medical occurrences/worsening of pre-existing medical condition without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A Serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect, AEs leading to discontinuation and AEs leading to death.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (subjects) |
|---|---|
| Saizen® E-Device | 0 |
| Group | Value (subjects) |
|---|---|
| Saizen® E-Device | 0 |
| Group | Value (subjects) |
|---|---|
| Saizen® E-Device | 1 |
| Group | Value (subjects) |
|---|---|
| Saizen® E-Device | 1 |
| Group | Value (subjects) |
|---|---|
| Saizen® E-Device | 0 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saizen® E-DeviceSaizen® (recombinant human growth hormone \[r-hGH\]) injection 8 milligram (mg) per 137 milliliter (mL) was administered using an electronic auto-injector (E-Device) subcutaneously (SC) in the evening as per local Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) for 60 days. | – | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated