Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 1/2Registry dataEndometriosis : Traditional Medicine vs Hormone Therapy
Overview
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Enrollment
- 50 participants
- Sponsor
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) · Nih
- Design
- Randomized · Open label (no masking)
- Countries
1 country
United States
- Start
- Sept 2002
- Primary completion
- Aug 2006
- Completion
- Aug 2006
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2002 (estimated)
- Last update posted
- 25 Jan 2008 (estimated)
- Conditions
- Endometriosis · Pelvic Pain
Timeline
1 trial · 1 completed
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 1/2
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This 36-week study will determine whether traditional Chinese medicine (acupuncture and Chinese herbs) is as effective as hormone therapy for alleviating endometriosis-related pelvic pain.
Interventions
- AcupunctureProcedure
- Chinese ProductsDrug
- NafarelinDrug
Arms0
The registry lists no arms for this trial.
Primary outcomes1
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Pain assessments
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
Completed trials do not always post results.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- from 18 Years up to 45 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.