Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2020

6 results

SUN-311 Adrenal Reserve Testing with the Glucagon Stimulation Test (GST) and Cosyntropin Stimulation Test (CST) in Deployed Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Nagireddi R, Win H, Wagstaff S, Neal M, Friedman K, Anderson R

Journal of the Endocrine Society8 May 2020

PMCIDPMC7208304 (opens in a new tab)PepBankPUB-93112381

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study6

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone6

In this study, Cosyntropin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Cosyntropin.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Cosyntropin aloneObservational studyActivity measurement

    In veterans with mild traumatic brain injury, 60-minute cosyntropin cortisol correlated with glucagon-test cortisol at Year 0 (r=0.553, p=0.008).

    In plain wordsIn veterans with mild brain injury, cosyntropin and glucagon cortisol tests correlated at baseline.

    Outcome
    Not applicableCortisol test correlation at Year 0
    Study

    n = 22

    Comparator
    Glucagon stimulation test
    Outcome group
    Adrenal Diagnostic Testing · Endocrine and hormones

    Measurements

    Correlation, GST cortisol vs 60-minute CST cortisol, Year 0
    0.553 r
    n = 22; p = 0.008

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Correlations of the cortisol levels from GST vs the 60-minute cortisol from CST were significant at Year 0 (n=22, r=0.553, p=0.008) and at Year 1 (n=18, r=0.802, p<0.0001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We reviewed the utility of the fixed dose Glucagon Stimulation Test (GST) compared with the high dose Cosyntropin Stimulation test (CST) for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) reserve over time in these patients with mTBI.
    Summary · context
    We present an interim report of our 4-year longitudinal prospective pilot study of pituitary function in Veterans diagnosed with mTBI.

    In this study, Cosyntropin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Cosyntropin.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Cosyntropin aloneObservational studyActivity measurement

    In veterans with mild traumatic brain injury, 60-minute cosyntropin cortisol correlated with glucagon-test cortisol at Year 1 (r=0.802, p<0.0001).

    In plain wordsIn veterans with mild brain injury, cosyntropin and glucagon cortisol tests correlated at the next annual test.

    Outcome
    Not applicableCortisol test correlation at Year 1
    Study

    n = 18

    Comparator
    Glucagon stimulation test
    Outcome group
    Adrenal Diagnostic Testing · Endocrine and hormones

    Measurements

    Correlation, GST cortisol vs 60-minute CST cortisol, Year 1
    0.802 r
    n = 18; p < 0.0001

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Correlations of the cortisol levels from GST vs the 60-minute cortisol from CST were significant at Year 0 (n=22, r=0.553, p=0.008) and at Year 1 (n=18, r=0.802, p<0.0001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We reviewed the utility of the fixed dose Glucagon Stimulation Test (GST) compared with the high dose Cosyntropin Stimulation test (CST) for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) reserve over time in these patients with mTBI.
    Summary · context
    We present an interim report of our 4-year longitudinal prospective pilot study of pituitary function in Veterans diagnosed with mTBI.

    In this study, Cosyntropin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Cosyntropin.

  3. 03HumanNot a test of Cosyntropin aloneObservational studyActivity measurement

    In veterans with mild traumatic brain injury, cosyntropin cortisol predicted low glucagon-test cortisol in only 2/6 subjects.

    In plain wordsIn veterans with mild brain injury, cosyntropin testing predicted low glucagon-test cortisol in only 2/6 subjects.

    Outcome
    Not applicablePrediction of low glucagon-test cortisol
    Study

    n = 6

    Comparator
    Glucagon stimulation test
    Outcome group
    Adrenal Diagnostic Testing · Endocrine and hormones

    Measurements

    Low GST cortisol cases predicted by CST cortisol
    2 subjects
    of 6 subjects

    Source sentences

    Summary
    However, the CST cortisol value predicted the low GST value in only 2/6 subjects.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We reviewed the utility of the fixed dose Glucagon Stimulation Test (GST) compared with the high dose Cosyntropin Stimulation test (CST) for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) reserve over time in these patients with mTBI.
    Summary · context
    We present an interim report of our 4-year longitudinal prospective pilot study of pituitary function in Veterans diagnosed with mTBI.

    In this study, Cosyntropin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Cosyntropin.

  4. 04HumanNot a test of Cosyntropin aloneObservational studyActivity measurement

    In veterans with mild traumatic brain injury, cosyntropin and glucagon cortisol tests showed no significant correlations at Years 2 through 4, which the abstract attributes to decreased numbers.

    In plain wordsIn veterans with mild brain injury, the tests did not significantly correlate in later years, which the abstract attributes to fewer people tested.

    Outcome
    No significant changeCortisol test correlations at Years 2 through 4
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Glucagon stimulation test
    Outcome group
    Adrenal Diagnostic Testing · Endocrine and hormones

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Due to decreased numbers, there were no significant correlations at Years 2 through 4.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We reviewed the utility of the fixed dose Glucagon Stimulation Test (GST) compared with the high dose Cosyntropin Stimulation test (CST) for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) reserve over time in these patients with mTBI.
    Summary · context
    We present an interim report of our 4-year longitudinal prospective pilot study of pituitary function in Veterans diagnosed with mTBI.

    In this study, Cosyntropin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Cosyntropin.

  5. 05HumanNot a test of Cosyntropin aloneObservational studyActivity measurement

    In veterans with mild traumatic brain injury, 30-minute cosyntropin cortisol gave correlations with glucagon-test cortisol similar to 60-minute values.

    In plain wordsIn veterans with mild brain injury, earlier cosyntropin cortisol values gave similar correlations with glucagon testing.

    Outcome
    Not applicableCorrelations using 30-minute cosyntropin cortisol
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Glucagon stimulation test
    Outcome group
    Adrenal Diagnostic Testing · Endocrine and hormones

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Similar correlations were obtained using the 30-minute CST values.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Correlations of the cortisol levels from GST vs the 60-minute cortisol from CST were significant at Year 0 (n=22, r=0.553, p=0.008) and at Year 1 (n=18, r=0.802, p<0.0001).
    Summary · context
    We reviewed the utility of the fixed dose Glucagon Stimulation Test (GST) compared with the high dose Cosyntropin Stimulation test (CST) for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) reserve over time in these patients with mTBI.
    Summary · context
    We present an interim report of our 4-year longitudinal prospective pilot study of pituitary function in Veterans diagnosed with mTBI.

    In this study, Cosyntropin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Cosyntropin.

  6. 06HumanNot a test of Cosyntropin aloneObservational studyActivity measurement

    In veterans with mild traumatic brain injury, mean 60-minute cosyntropin cortisol did not significantly differ across Years 0 through 4 (F=1.519, p=0.206).

    In plain wordsIn veterans with mild brain injury, mean cosyntropin cortisol results did not significantly differ across follow-up years.

    Outcome
    No significant changeCosyntropin cortisol over follow-up years
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Other follow-up years
    Outcome group
    Adrenal Diagnostic Testing · Endocrine and hormones

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The mean GST cortisol levels and 60-minute CST cortisol levels for subjects at each year were not significantly different over Years 0 through 4 based on ANOVA analyses (CST: F=1.519, p= 0.206; GST: F= 0.796, p=0.532).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We reviewed the utility of the fixed dose Glucagon Stimulation Test (GST) compared with the high dose Cosyntropin Stimulation test (CST) for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) reserve over time in these patients with mTBI.
    Summary · context
    We present an interim report of our 4-year longitudinal prospective pilot study of pituitary function in Veterans diagnosed with mTBI.

    In this study, Cosyntropin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Cosyntropin.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:37 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

Publication types

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.