In phlebotomy-dependent patients with polycythemia vera, clinical response occurred in 77% with rusfertide versus 33% with placebo.
In plain wordsIn patients with polycythemia vera, 77% with rusfertide versus 33% with placebo achieved clinical response.
- Peptide
- Rusfertide
- Outcome
- IncreaseClinical response during weeks 20-32
- Study
n = 293
- Comparator
- Placebo
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Blood counts and hematopoiesis · Whole body
- Studied dose
- Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 32 weeksAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Clinical response
- 77%
- rusfertide, n = 113
- Clinical response
- 33%
- placebo, n = 48
Source sentences
Significantly more patients (n = 113, 77%) achieved a clinical response with rusfertide versus placebo (n = 48; 33%; P < .0001).
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
The primary efficacy end point was clinical response (absence of phlebotomy eligibility; weeks 20-32).
The phase III VERIFY trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of rusfertide in phlebotomy-dependent patients with PV and poorly controlled hematocrit.
In VERIFY Part 1a (32 weeks), patients requiring frequent phlebotomy were randomly assigned (1:1, double-blind) to receive rusfertide or placebo with or without cytoreductive therapy.