In diabetes patients, dulaglutide plus dapagliflozin reduced perfused boundary region more than DPP-4 inhibitors after twelve months.
In plain wordsIn diabetes patients, dulaglutide plus dapagliflozin improved a blood-vessel lining measure more than DPP-4 inhibitors.
- Peptide
- Dulaglutide (Trulicity)
- Outcome
- DecreasePerfused boundary region at twelve months
- Study
n = 60
- Comparator
- DPP-4 inhibitors
- Outcome group
- Vascular function · Cardiovascular
Measurements
- PBR
- 2.1 μm
- dulaglutide plus dapagliflozin, baseline
- PBR
- 1.93 μm
- dulaglutide plus dapagliflozin, 12 months
- PBR
- 2.11 μm
- DPP-4 inhibitors, baseline
- PBR
- 2.08 μm
- DPP-4 inhibitors, 12 months
Source sentences
After twelve months, dual therapy showed greater improvements vs. DPP-4i in PBR (2.10 ± 0.31 to 1.93 ± 0.23 μm vs. 2.11 ± 0.31 to 2.08 ± 0.28 μm, p < 0.001)
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
In this study, we compared the effect of the combination of dulaglutide and dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors on the endothelial glycocalyx, arterial stiffness, myocardial function, and albuminuria.
Overall, 60 patients were randomized to combined dulaglutide and dapagliflozin treatment (n = 30) or DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i, n = 30) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06611904).
We measured at baseline and 4 and 12 months post-treatment: (i) the perfused boundary region of the sublingual arterial microvessels, (ii) pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), (iii) global left ventricular longitudinal strain (GLS), and (iv) urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR).
In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).