In immobilized mice, MOTS‑c attenuated muscle loss: about 15% reduction of muscle mass with immobilization alone versus 5% with MOTS‑c.
In plain wordsIn mice, MOTS‑c reduced the muscle loss caused by immobilization compared with immobilized mice given water.
- Peptide
- MOTS-c
- Outcome
- DecreaseImmobilization-induced loss of muscle mass
- Study
mousen: not reported in source
Immobilization-induced muscle atrophy (casting)- Comparator
- Immobilization control (sterilized water injection)
- Outcome group
- Muscle injury and repair · Musculoskeletal
- Studied dose
- 15 mg/kg/day · injection · 8 daysAs given in this study (mouse).
Measurements
- Muscle mass reduction
- ≈ 15%
- Immobilization control
- Muscle mass reduction
- 5%
- Immobilization plus MOTS-c
Source sentences
Immobilization reduced ∼15% of muscle mass, whereas MOTS-c treatment attenuated muscle loss, with only a 5% reduction.
1 context sentence(design, population, supporting numbers)
Male C57BL/6J mice (10 wk old) were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental groups: nonimmobilization control group (sterilized water injection), immobilization control group (sterilized water injection), and immobilization and MOTS-c-treated group (15 mg/kg/day MOTS-c injection).