Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 20 · 2022

8 results

Low-Dose Dasiglucagon Versus Oral Glucose for Prevention of Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 Diabetes: A Phase 2, Randomized, Three-Arm Crossover Study.

Laugesen C, Ranjan AG, Schmidt S, Nørgaard K

Diabetes care1 Jun 2022Cited by 9 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study8

8 results from studies that gave the peptide. 8 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemia occurred in 5 after dasiglucagon versus 10 after oral glucose (P = 0.096).

    In plain wordsDasiglucagon produced numerically fewer hypoglycemia cases than oral glucose, without a significant difference.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHypoglycemia occurrence
    Study

    n = 20

    Comparator
    15 g oral glucose
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    80 µg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with hypoglycemia
    5 participants
    80 µg dasiglucagon (D80)
    Participants with hypoglycemia
    10 participants
    15 g oral glucose (CHO)

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]) occurred in 10 participants after CHO, in 5 after D80, and in 4 after D120 (CHO vs. D80, P = 0.096; CHO vs. D120, P = 0.034).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy completed a phase 2, randomized, three-arm crossover study.
    Summary · context
    When a PG concentration of 4.5 mmol/L (81 mg/dL) was reached, 15 g oral glucose (CHO) from dextrose tablets, 80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), or 120 µg dasiglucagon (D120) was administered.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemia occurred in 4 after dasiglucagon versus 10 after oral glucose (P = 0.034).

    In plain wordsDasiglucagon reduced hypoglycemia occurrence compared with oral glucose.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHypoglycemia occurrence
    Study

    n = 20

    Comparator
    15 g oral glucose
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 µg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with hypoglycemia
    4 participants
    120 µg dasiglucagon (D120)
    Participants with hypoglycemia
    10 participants
    15 g oral glucose (CHO)

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]) occurred in 10 participants after CHO, in 5 after D80, and in 4 after D120 (CHO vs. D80, P = 0.096; CHO vs. D120, P = 0.034).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy completed a phase 2, randomized, three-arm crossover study.
    Summary · context
    When a PG concentration of 4.5 mmol/L (81 mg/dL) was reached, 15 g oral glucose (CHO) from dextrose tablets, 80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), or 120 µg dasiglucagon (D120) was administered.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    Time in hypoglycemia was 7% after dasiglucagon versus 14% after oral glucose, with no significant overall difference (P = 0.273).

    In plain wordsTime in hypoglycemia did not differ significantly across interventions.

    Outcome
    No significant changeTime in hypoglycemia
    Study

    n = 20

    Comparator
    15 g oral glucose
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    80 µg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Time in hypoglycemia
    7%
    80 µg dasiglucagon (D80)
    Time in hypoglycemia
    14%
    15 g oral glucose (CHO)

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Time spent in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]) was 14%, 7%, and 6% for CHO, D80, and D120, respectively (P = 0.273).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy completed a phase 2, randomized, three-arm crossover study.
    Summary · context
    When a PG concentration of 4.5 mmol/L (81 mg/dL) was reached, 15 g oral glucose (CHO) from dextrose tablets, 80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), or 120 µg dasiglucagon (D120) was administered.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    Time in hypoglycemia was 6% after dasiglucagon versus 14% after oral glucose, with no significant overall difference (P = 0.273).

    In plain wordsTime in hypoglycemia did not differ significantly across interventions.

    Outcome
    No significant changeTime in hypoglycemia
    Study

    n = 20

    Comparator
    15 g oral glucose
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    120 µg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Time in hypoglycemia
    6%
    120 µg dasiglucagon (D120)
    Time in hypoglycemia
    14%
    15 g oral glucose (CHO)

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Time spent in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]) was 14%, 7%, and 6% for CHO, D80, and D120, respectively (P = 0.273).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy completed a phase 2, randomized, three-arm crossover study.
    Summary · context
    When a PG concentration of 4.5 mmol/L (81 mg/dL) was reached, 15 g oral glucose (CHO) from dextrose tablets, 80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), or 120 µg dasiglucagon (D120) was administered.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    Median time to a glucose increase of 1.1 mmol/L was 15 (95% CI 15-20) minutes after dasiglucagon versus 30 (25-50) after oral glucose (P = 0.006).

    In plain wordsDasiglucagon raised glucose faster than oral glucose.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTime to glucose increase
    Study

    n = 20

    Comparator
    15 g oral glucose
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    80 µg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Median time to PG increase of 1.1 mmol/L
    15 minutes
    80 µg dasiglucagon (D80)
    95% CI
    15 to 20 minutes
    80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), median time
    Median time to PG increase of 1.1 mmol/L
    30 minutes
    15 g oral glucose (CHO)
    95% CI
    25 to 50 minutes
    15 g oral glucose (CHO), median time

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The median time (95% CI) from intervention to first increase in PG of 1.1 mmol/L (20 mg/dL) was 30 (25-50), 15 (15-20), and 15 (15-20) minutes for CHO, D80, and D120, respectively (CHO vs. D80, P = 0.006; CHO vs. D120, P = 0.003).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy completed a phase 2, randomized, three-arm crossover study.
    Summary · context
    When a PG concentration of 4.5 mmol/L (81 mg/dL) was reached, 15 g oral glucose (CHO) from dextrose tablets, 80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), or 120 µg dasiglucagon (D120) was administered.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    Median time to a first 1.1 mmol/L glucose increase was 15 (95% CI 15-20) minutes after both 80 µg and 120 µg dasiglucagon versus 30 (25-50) minutes after oral glucose (CHO vs. D80, P = 0.006; CHO vs. D120, P = 0.003).

    In plain wordsDasiglucagon raised glucose faster than oral glucose.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTime to glucose increase
    Study

    n = 20

    Comparator
    15 g oral glucose
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    80 or 120 µg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Median time to first PG increase of 1.1 mmol/L
    30 minutes
    15 g oral glucose; 95% CI 25-50
    Median time to first PG increase of 1.1 mmol/L
    15 minutes
    80 µg dasiglucagon; 95% CI 15-20
    Median time to first PG increase of 1.1 mmol/L
    15 minutes
    120 µg dasiglucagon; 95% CI 15-20

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The median time (95% CI) from intervention to first increase in PG of 1.1 mmol/L (20 mg/dL) was 30 (25-50), 15 (15-20), and 15 (15-20) minutes for CHO, D80, and D120, respectively (CHO vs. D80, P = 0.006; CHO vs. D120, P = 0.003).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy completed a phase 2, randomized, three-arm crossover study.
    Summary · context
    When a PG concentration of 4.5 mmol/L (81 mg/dL) was reached, 15 g oral glucose (CHO) from dextrose tablets, 80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), or 120 µg dasiglucagon (D120) was administered.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    Nausea episodes were numerically higher after dasiglucagon than oral glucose, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsNausea was numerically more frequent with dasiglucagon than oral glucose, without a significant difference.

    Outcome
    No significant changeNausea
    Study

    n = 20

    Comparator
    15 g oral glucose
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    80 or 120 µg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Episodes of nausea were numerically, but not significantly, higher after dasiglucagon administration.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy completed a phase 2, randomized, three-arm crossover study.
    Summary · context
    When a PG concentration of 4.5 mmol/L (81 mg/dL) was reached, 15 g oral glucose (CHO) from dextrose tablets, 80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), or 120 µg dasiglucagon (D120) was administered.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    Visual analog scale-assessed adverse effects did not differ significantly between dasiglucagon and oral glucose interventions.

    In plain wordsReported adverse effects did not differ significantly between dasiglucagon and oral glucose.

    Outcome
    No significant changeVisual analog scale adverse effects
    Study

    n = 20

    Comparator
    15 g oral glucose
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    80 or 120 µg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences in visual analog scale-assessed adverse effects were observed between interventions.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injection or insulin pump therapy completed a phase 2, randomized, three-arm crossover study.
    Summary · context
    When a PG concentration of 4.5 mmol/L (81 mg/dL) was reached, 15 g oral glucose (CHO) from dextrose tablets, 80 µg dasiglucagon (D80), or 120 µg dasiglucagon (D120) was administered.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials2

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 trials · 2 completed · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedNot applicableNCT06082973

Dual-hormone Artificial Pancreas Versus Single-hormone Under Exercise and a Meal Challenge

Universitat Politècnica de Valèncian = 1515 May 2024 to 30 May 2025

Type 1 Diabetes

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 18 Dec 2025
CompletedPhase 2NCT04449692

Low-dose Dasiglucagon for Prevention of Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 Diabetes

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagenn = 202 Jul 2020 to 4 Jan 2021

Type 1 Diabetes · Hypoglycemia

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.