Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2022

4 results

Polyaspartic acid, 2-acrylamido-2-Methyl propane sulfonic acid and sodium alginate based biocompatible stimuli responsive polymer gel for controlled release of GHK-Cu peptide for wound healing.

Sharma S, Anwar MF, Dinda AK, Singhal M, Dua A, Malik A

Journal of biomaterials applications26 Mar 2022Cited by 2 (Europe PMC)

PMID35341370 (opens in a new tab)DOI10.1177/08853282221076708 (opens in a new tab)PepBankPUB-35341370
Publisher pagePubMedAsk about this study
Jump to 4 results

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study4

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone4

In this study, GHK-Cu was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking GHK-Cu.

  1. 01LabNot a test of GHK-Cu aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    The EGDMA cross-linked polymer encapsulated GHK‑Cu with an efficiency of 55.26%.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, a polymer gel made with EGDMA held 55.26% of the GHK‑Cu peptide.

    Peptide
    GHK-Cu
    Outcome
    Not applicableEncapsulation efficiency, EGDMA polymer
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Polymer gel
    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Encapsulation efficiency
    55.26%
    EGDMA polymer

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The encapsulation efficiency of the polymer for encapsulating (glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine-copper) GHK-Cu was observed to be 55.26% and peptide release of 51.84% was observed for Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate based polymer after 24 h whereas for Trimethylolpropane triacrylate based polymer the encap…

    In this study, GHK-Cu was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking GHK-Cu.

  2. 02LabNot a test of GHK-Cu aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    The EGDMA cross-linked polymer released 51.84% of GHK‑Cu after 24 h.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, a polymer gel made with EGDMA released 51.84% of the GHK‑Cu peptide after 24 hours.

    Peptide
    GHK-Cu
    Outcome
    Not applicablePeptide release at 24 h, EGDMA polymer
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Polymer gel
    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Peptide release
    51.84%
    EGDMA polymer, 24 h

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The encapsulation efficiency of the polymer for encapsulating (glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine-copper) GHK-Cu was observed to be 55.26% and peptide release of 51.84% was observed for Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate based polymer after 24 h whereas for Trimethylolpropane triacrylate based polymer the encap…

    In this study, GHK-Cu was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking GHK-Cu.

  3. 03LabNot a test of GHK-Cu aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    The TMPTA cross-linked polymer encapsulated GHK‑Cu with an efficiency of 49.6%.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, a polymer gel made with TMPTA held 49.6% of the GHK‑Cu peptide.

    Peptide
    GHK-Cu
    Outcome
    Not applicableEncapsulation efficiency, TMPTA polymer
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Polymer gel
    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Encapsulation efficiency
    49.6%
    TMPTA polymer

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The encapsulation efficiency of the polymer for encapsulating (glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine-copper) GHK-Cu was observed to be 55.26% and peptide release of 51.84% was observed for Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate based polymer after 24 h whereas for Trimethylolpropane triacrylate based polymer the encap…

    In this study, GHK-Cu was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking GHK-Cu.

  4. 04LabNot a test of GHK-Cu aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    The TMPTA cross-linked polymer released 39.01% of GHK‑Cu after 24 h.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, a polymer gel made with TMPTA released 39.01% of the GHK‑Cu peptide after 24 hours.

    Peptide
    GHK-Cu
    Outcome
    Not applicablePeptide release at 24 h, TMPTA polymer
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Polymer gel
    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Peptide release
    39.01%
    TMPTA polymer, 24 h

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The encapsulation efficiency of the polymer for encapsulating (glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine-copper) GHK-Cu was observed to be 55.26% and peptide release of 51.84% was observed for Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate based polymer after 24 h whereas for Trimethylolpropane triacrylate based polymer the encap…

    In this study, GHK-Cu was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking GHK-Cu.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    9 Oct 2026, 18:17 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:03 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:56 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.