Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2021

8 results

QbD-driven development of dissolving microneedle patch loaded with ultradeformable liposomes encapsulated Noopept: Exploring a patient friendly, once-daily option to manage dementia.

Srivastava PK, Thakkar HP

European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences11 Jun 2021Cited by 9 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study8

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone8

In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  1. 01AnimalNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneAnimal study (in vivo)Pharmacokinetics

    In Sprague Dawley rats, the noopept patch increased relative bioavailability 3-fold compared with oral noopept suspension.

    In plain wordsIn rats, the noopept patch increased relative bioavailability 3-fold compared with oral noopept suspension.

    Outcome
    IncreaseRelative bioavailability
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Sprague Dawley rats
    Comparator
    Oral NPT suspension
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Relative bioavailability increase
    3 fold
    Compared with oral NPT suspension

    Source sentences

    Summary
    A 3-fold increase in relative bioavailability with similar pharmacological response as compared to oral NPT suspension was also observed during PK-PD studies in Sprague Dawley rats.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  2. 02AnimalNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In Sprague Dawley rats, the noopept patch produced a pharmacological response similar to oral noopept suspension.

    In plain wordsIn rats, the noopept patch produced a similar pharmacological response to oral noopept suspension.

    Outcome
    No significant changePharmacological response
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Sprague Dawley rats
    Comparator
    Oral NPT suspension
    Outcome group
    Overall treatment effect · Nervous system and cognition

    Source sentences

    Summary
    A 3-fold increase in relative bioavailability with similar pharmacological response as compared to oral NPT suspension was also observed during PK-PD studies in Sprague Dawley rats.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  3. 03LabNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneEx vivo tissuePharmacokinetics

    Across pig ear skin, the noopept liposome microneedle patch increased steady state flux 6.5-fold compared with noopept suspension.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests of pig skin, the noopept patch increased steady state flux 6.5-fold compared with noopept suspension.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSteady state skin flux
    Study

    pign: not reported in source

    Full thickness pig ear skin
    Comparator
    NPT suspension
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Steady state flux increase
    6.5 fold
    Compared with NPT suspension

    Source sentences

    Summary
    NPT UDL MNP showed a 6.5-fold increase in steady state flux across full thickness pig ear skin as compared to NPT suspension.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  4. 04LabNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneIn vitro (cells)Safety outcome

    In HaCaT cells, viability after exposure to the noopept liposome microneedle matrix was 89.74%.

    In plain wordsIn cells, viability after exposure to the noopept patch matrix was 89.74%.

    Outcome
    Not applicableCell viability
    Study

    humann: not reported in source

    HaCaT cells exposed to NPT UDL MNP matrix
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Cell viability
    89.74%
    After NPT UDL MNP matrix exposure

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In vitro viability of HaCaT cells after exposure to NPT UDL MNP matrix was found to be 89.74% supporting the formulation as safe for transdermal application.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  5. 05LabNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Activity measurement

    In formulation tests, the noopept liposome microneedle patch had sufficient axial needle fracture force to breach the stratum corneum.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, the noopept patch had enough needle strength to breach the outer skin layer.

    Outcome
    Not applicableAxial needle fracture force
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Noopept liposome microneedle patch
    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Axial needle fracture force
    0.688 N
    NPT UDL MNP

    Source sentences

    Summary
    NPT UDL MNP possessed axial needle fracture force of 0.688 N which was sufficient enough to breach stratum corneum.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  6. 06LabNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Activity measurement

    In physical stability tests, redispersed noopept liposomes retained an identical vesicle shape compared with optimized liposomes.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, redispersed noopept liposomes had the same shape as optimized liposomes.

    Outcome
    No significant changeVesicle shape stability
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Redispersed noopept liposomes from microneedle matrix
    Comparator
    Optimized NPT UDL
    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Physical stability evaluation revealed that NPT UDL re-dispersion obtained from MNP matrix dissolution possessed identical vesicle shape and size while retaining > 99% NPT when compared to optimized NPT UDL.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  7. 07LabNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Activity measurement

    In physical stability tests, redispersed noopept liposomes retained an identical vesicle size compared with optimized liposomes.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, redispersed noopept liposomes had the same size as optimized liposomes.

    Outcome
    No significant changeVesicle size stability
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Redispersed noopept liposomes from microneedle matrix
    Comparator
    Optimized NPT UDL
    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Physical stability evaluation revealed that NPT UDL re-dispersion obtained from MNP matrix dissolution possessed identical vesicle shape and size while retaining > 99% NPT when compared to optimized NPT UDL.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  8. 08LabNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Activity measurement

    In physical stability tests, redispersed liposomes retained more than 99% of noopept compared with optimized liposomes.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, redispersed liposomes retained more than 99% of noopept compared with optimized liposomes.

    Outcome
    Not applicableNoopept retention
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Redispersed noopept liposomes from microneedle matrix
    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    NPT retention
    > 99%
    Redispersion compared with optimized NPT UDL

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Physical stability evaluation revealed that NPT UDL re-dispersion obtained from MNP matrix dissolution possessed identical vesicle shape and size while retaining > 99% NPT when compared to optimized NPT UDL.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    21 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.