Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2021

1 result

Coassemble dopamine and GHK tripeptide into fluorescent nanoparticles for pH sensing.

Zheng F, Guo J, Khan AJ, Miao P, Zhang F

Luminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence18 Jul 2020Cited by 2 (Europe PMC)

PMID32598511 (opens in a new tab)DOI10.1002/bio.3907 (opens in a new tab)PepBankPUB-32598511
Publisher pagePubMedAsk about this study
Jump to 1 result

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, GHK-Cu was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking GHK-Cu.

  1. 01LabNot a test of GHK-Cu aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    Nanostructures of GHK co-assembled with oxidized dopamine had a fluorescence quantum yield of 20.82%.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, nanoparticles made from a GHK tripeptide and oxidized dopamine glowed brightly, with a quantum yield of 20.82%.

    Peptide
    GHK-Cu
    Outcome
    Not applicableQuantum yield of GHK-DAox nanostructures
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Formulation, delivery and stability · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    quantum yield
    20.82%
    GHK-DAox nanostructures

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The GHK-DAox nanostructures have a quantum yield of 20.82%, which might be the brightest one among all the current co-assembling structures merely through unmodified biomolecules.

    In this study, GHK-Cu was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking GHK-Cu.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    10 Oct 2026, 08:19 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:03 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:56 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

Publication types

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.