Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2020

5 results

Achieving the composite end-point of glycated hemoglobin <7.0% without weight gain or hypoglycemia with once-weekly dulaglutide in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: A post-hoc analysis.

Xiao X, Wang C, Lai X, Zhang B, Gu L, Hou J, Zhou Z

Journal of diabetes investigation3 Jan 2020Cited by 2 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study5

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, more patients reached HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain or hypoglycemia at week 26 with dulaglutide 1.5 mg (40-48%) than with the active comparators glimepiride or insulin glargine (15-20%).

    In plain wordsIn Chinese patients with diabetes, more reached the combined target with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than with glimepiride or insulin glargine at week 26.

    Outcome
    IncreasePrimary composite at week 26
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Active comparators (glimepiride or insulin glargine, by trial)
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite attainment
    40 to 48%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg, range across the two trials
    Composite attainment
    15 to 20%
    active comparators (glimepiride or insulin glargine), range across the two trials

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In each analyzed trial, 40-48% of patients received DU (1.5 mg), 30-39% of patients received DU (0.75 mg) and 15-20% of patients on active comparators (GLIM/GLAR) reached the primary composite end-point at week 26 (P < 0.001 for DU vs GLIM/GLAR).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To assess the effect of dulaglutide (DU) 1.5/0.75 mg in comparison with glimepiride (GLIM) or insulin glargine (GLAR) on the composite end-point in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients.
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analyses of two randomized phase III trials (NCT01644500 and NCT01648582) were carried out using Fisher's exact test.
    Summary · context
    The primary composite end-point was the number of patients reaching glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0%, without weight gain and hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    Secondary composite end-points included the number of patients reaching HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain and HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycemia.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, more patients reached HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain or hypoglycemia at week 26 with dulaglutide 0.75 mg (30-39%) than with the active comparators glimepiride or insulin glargine (15-20%).

    In plain wordsIn Chinese patients with diabetes, more reached the combined target with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than with glimepiride or insulin glargine at week 26.

    Outcome
    IncreasePrimary composite at week 26
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Active comparators (glimepiride or insulin glargine, by trial)
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite attainment
    30 to 39%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg, range across the two trials
    Composite attainment
    15 to 20%
    active comparators (glimepiride or insulin glargine), range across the two trials

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In each analyzed trial, 40-48% of patients received DU (1.5 mg), 30-39% of patients received DU (0.75 mg) and 15-20% of patients on active comparators (GLIM/GLAR) reached the primary composite end-point at week 26 (P < 0.001 for DU vs GLIM/GLAR).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To assess the effect of dulaglutide (DU) 1.5/0.75 mg in comparison with glimepiride (GLIM) or insulin glargine (GLAR) on the composite end-point in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients.
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analyses of two randomized phase III trials (NCT01644500 and NCT01648582) were carried out using Fisher's exact test.
    Summary · context
    The primary composite end-point was the number of patients reaching glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0%, without weight gain and hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    Secondary composite end-points included the number of patients reaching HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain and HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycemia.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Chinese patients with diabetes, dulaglutide 1.5 mg increased composite target attainment versus insulin glargine at week 52.

    In plain wordsIn Chinese patients with diabetes, dulaglutide 1.5 mg improved combined target attainment compared with insulin glargine at 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    IncreasePrimary composite at week 52
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite attainment
    26%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Composite attainment
    7%
    glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At 52 weeks, 26% of patients that received DU (1.5 mg), 23% of patients that received DU (0.75 mg) and 7% of patients that received GLAR attained the primary composite end-point (P < 0.001 for DU vs GLAR).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To assess the effect of dulaglutide (DU) 1.5/0.75 mg in comparison with glimepiride (GLIM) or insulin glargine (GLAR) on the composite end-point in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients.
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analyses of two randomized phase III trials (NCT01644500 and NCT01648582) were carried out using Fisher's exact test.
    Summary · context
    The primary composite end-point was the number of patients reaching glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0%, without weight gain and hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    Secondary composite end-points included the number of patients reaching HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain and HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycemia.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Chinese patients with diabetes, dulaglutide 0.75 mg increased composite target attainment versus insulin glargine at week 52.

    In plain wordsIn Chinese patients with diabetes, dulaglutide 0.75 mg improved combined target attainment compared with insulin glargine at 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    IncreasePrimary composite at week 52
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite attainment
    23%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    Composite attainment
    7%
    glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At 52 weeks, 26% of patients that received DU (1.5 mg), 23% of patients that received DU (0.75 mg) and 7% of patients that received GLAR attained the primary composite end-point (P < 0.001 for DU vs GLAR).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To assess the effect of dulaglutide (DU) 1.5/0.75 mg in comparison with glimepiride (GLIM) or insulin glargine (GLAR) on the composite end-point in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients.
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analyses of two randomized phase III trials (NCT01644500 and NCT01648582) were carried out using Fisher's exact test.
    Summary · context
    The primary composite end-point was the number of patients reaching glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0%, without weight gain and hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    Secondary composite end-points included the number of patients reaching HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain and HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycemia.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, the secondary composite end-points showed a trend similar to the primary composite end-point for dulaglutide versus glimepiride or insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn Chinese patients with diabetes, the secondary combined targets showed a similar trend for dulaglutide compared with glimepiride or insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSecondary composite end-points (HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain; HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycemia)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Glimepiride or insulin glargine (active comparators)
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    A similar trend of results was found for secondary composite end-points.
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Secondary composite end-points included the number of patients reaching HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain and HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    In each analyzed trial, 40-48% of patients received DU (1.5 mg), 30-39% of patients received DU (0.75 mg) and 15-20% of patients on active comparators (GLIM/GLAR) reached the primary composite end-point at week 26 (P < 0.001 for DU vs GLIM/GLAR).
    Summary · context
    To assess the effect of dulaglutide (DU) 1.5/0.75 mg in comparison with glimepiride (GLIM) or insulin glargine (GLAR) on the composite end-point in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients.
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analyses of two randomized phase III trials (NCT01644500 and NCT01648582) were carried out using Fisher's exact test.
    Summary · context
    The primary composite end-point was the number of patients reaching glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0%, without weight gain and hypoglycemia.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.