Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2020

3 results

The occurrence of putative cognitive enhancing research peptides in seized pharmaceutical preparations: An incentive for controlling agencies to prepare for future encounters of the kind.

Vanhee C, Francotte A, Janvier S, Deconinck E

Drug testing and analysis29 Jan 2020Cited by 2 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study3

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone3

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 01LabNot a test of Selank aloneOther designOther

    In two seized suspicious preparations, analysis identified Selank.

    In plain wordsIn two seized products, lab analysis found Selank, a research peptide.

    Peptide
    Selank
    Outcome
    Not applicableIdentification of Selank in seized preparations
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Seized pharmaceutical preparations
    Outcome group
    Analytical methods and detection · Pharmacology

    Source sentences

    Summary
    It turned out that these samples contained the assumedly cognitive enhancing research peptides Selank and Semax, which, to our knowledge, have not completed any clinical trials.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    At the end of 2017 and 2018 two different unknown suspicious preparations were encountered and were subjected to a plethora of different analyses in order to identify, if present, any bioactive compound.

    In this study, Selank was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Selank.

  2. 02LabNot a test of Selank aloneOther designOther

    A combined LC-MS/MS method was developed for 10 putative cognitive enhancing peptides and validated in different matrices.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, a new mass spectrometry method was built to detect 10 research peptides sold online.

    Peptide
    Selank
    Outcome
    Not applicableLC-MS/MS screening method for putative cognitive enhancing peptides
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    LC-MS/MS method validated in different matrices
    Outcome group
    Analytical methods and detection · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Peptides covered by the method
    10 peptides
    LC-MS/MS method

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Therefore, these findings served as an incentive to develop a novel combined liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS) methodology, applicable to both hydrophilic or more hydrophobic peptides, which was utilized to analyze a total of 10 putative cognitive enhancing polypeptides, with…
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    The screening rationale, complying to the recommendation paper of the General European Official Medicines Control Laboratory (OMCL) network on the interpretation of screening results for unknown peptides by mass spectrometry, was also validated in different matrices as required by ISO 17025.

    In this study, Selank was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Selank.

  3. 03LabNot a test of Semax aloneOther designOther

    Chemical analysis of two seized suspicious preparations identified Semax, together with Selank, as contained peptides.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, two seized suspicious products were found to contain Semax and Selank.

    Peptide
    Semax
    Outcome
    Not applicableSemax identified in seized preparation
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Product quality and purity · Pharmacology

    Source sentences

    Summary
    these samples contained the assumedly cognitive enhancing research peptides Selank and Semax, which, to our knowledge, have not completed any clinical trials.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    At the end of 2017 and 2018 two different unknown suspicious preparations were encountered and were subjected to a plethora of different analyses in order to identify, if present, any bioactive compound.

    In this study, Semax was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semax.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Versions 3 to 38Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:04 UTC

    The same notice was added 36 times, first on 9 Oct 2026, 19:08 UTC. The status did not change between them.

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.