Skip to content

Study · Measured the body's own peptide · 2019

1 result

Cationic antimicrobial peptides and periodontal physiopathology: A systematic review.

Jourdain ML, Velard F, Pierrard L, Sergheraert J, Gangloff SC, Braux J

Journal of periodontal research19 Jun 2019Cited by 28 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Natural levels measured1

These results measure the body's own peptide. Nobody was given the peptide. They are not evidence about taking it. They are left out of key results, evidence counts and charts.

  1. 01HumanEndogenous levelSystematic reviewOther

    A systematic review found significant correlations between the body's own LL‑37 level in oral fluids or tissues and clinical periodontal indexes (PD, CAL) and/or bacteriological index.

    In plain wordsStudies linked higher or lower natural LL‑37 levels in the mouth to measures of gum disease; the direction is not stated.

    Peptide
    LL-37
    Outcome
    Direction not reportedAssociation of LL-37 level with periodontal indexes
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Significant correlations between clinical periodontal indexes (PD, CAL) and/or bacteriological index and LL37 level were retrieved.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Only clinical studies that focused on assays of the expression and/or production of AMPs in human adult oral fluids (gingival crevicular fluid or saliva) or in oral tissues were retained and finally seventy-four publications meeting inclusion criteria were included.

    This result measures the body's own LL-37. Nobody was given the peptide. It is not evidence about taking it.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    9 Oct 2026, 18:17 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:03 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:56 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.