Skip to content

Study · In vitro (cells) · 2019

2 results

Drug with Neuroprotective Properties Noopept Does Not Stimulate Cell Proliferation.

Zainullina LF, Ivanova TV, Ostrovskaya RU, Gudasheva TA, Vakhitova YV, Seredenin SB

Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine20 Feb 2019

PMID30788746 (opens in a new tab)DOI10.1007/s10517-019-04373-8 (opens in a new tab)PepBankPUB-30788746
Publisher pagePubMedAsk about this study
Jump to 2 results

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. No result from this study comes from people.

  1. 01LabIn vitro (cells)Activity measurement

    In HEK293 and SH-SY5Y cells, Noopept did not affect cell cycle phase distribution.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change cell cycle phase distribution.

    Peptide
    Noopept (omberacetam)
    Outcome
    No significant changeCell cycle phase distribution
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 and SH-SY5Y cells
    Outcome group
    Cell proliferation and differentiation · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept did not affect cell distribution over G1, S, G2 cell cycle phases and the relative level of proliferation marker Ki-67 in the cell lines under study.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Effects of Noopept (N-phenylacetyl-L-prolylglycine ethyl ester) on the relative level of proliferation marker Ki-67 and cell cycle parameters were studied in HEK293 and SH-SY5Y cell lines.
  2. 02LabIn vitro (cells)Activity measurement

    In HEK293 and SH-SY5Y cells, Noopept did not affect relative Ki-67 levels.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change relative Ki-67 levels.

    Peptide
    Noopept (omberacetam)
    Outcome
    No significant changeKi-67
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 and SH-SY5Y cells
    Outcome group
    Cell proliferation and differentiation · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept did not affect cell distribution over G1, S, G2 cell cycle phases and the relative level of proliferation marker Ki-67 in the cell lines under study.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Effects of Noopept (N-phenylacetyl-L-prolylglycine ethyl ester) on the relative level of proliferation marker Ki-67 and cell cycle parameters were studied in HEK293 and SH-SY5Y cell lines.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    21 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

Publication types

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.