Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 8 · 2019

10 results

Lixisenatide Reduces Chylomicron Triacylglycerol by Increased Clearance.

Whyte MB, Shojaee-Moradie F, Sharaf SE, Jackson NC, Fielding B, Hovorka R, Mendis J, Russell-Jones D, Umpleby AM

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism1 Feb 2019Cited by 23 (Europe PMC)

Summary

ContextGlucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists control postprandial glucose and lipid excursion in type 2 diabetes; however, the mechanisms are unclear.ObjectiveTo determine the mechanisms of postprandial lipid and glucose control with lixisenatide (GLP-1 analog) in type 2 diabetes.DesignRandomized, double-blind, cross-over study.SettingCentre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Research, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom.PatientsEight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].InterventionsTwo metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.Main outcome measuresStudy one: very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and chylomicron (CM) triacylglycerol (TAG) kinetics were measured with an IV bolus of [2H5]glycerol in a 12-hour study, with hourly feeding. Oral [13C]triolein, in a single meal, labeled enterally derived TAG. Study two: glucose kinetics were measured with [U-13C]glucose in a mixed-meal (plus acetaminophen to measure gastric emptying) and variable IV [6,6-2H2]glucose infusion.ResultsStudy one: CM-TAG (but not VLDL-TAG) pool-size was lower with lixisenatide (P = 0.046). Lixisenatide reduced CM [13C]oleate area under the curve (AUC)60-480min concentration (P = 0.048) and increased CM-TAG clearance, with no effect on CM-TAG production rate. Study two: postprandial glucose and insulin AUC0-240min were reduced with lixisenatide (P = 0.0051; P < 0.05). Total glucose production (P = 0.015), rate of glucose appearance from the meal (P = 0.0098), and acetaminophen AUC0-360min (P = 0.006) were lower with lixisenatide than with placebo.ConclusionsLixisenatide reduced [13C]oleate concentrations, derived from a single meal in CM-TAG and glucose rate of appearance from the meal through delayed gastric emptying. However, day-long CM production, measured with repeated meal feeding, was not reduced by lixisenatide and decreased CM-TAG concentration resulted from increased CM-TAG clearance.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study10

10 results from studies that gave the peptide. 10 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide reduced CM-TAG pool size versus placebo (P = 0.046).

    In plain wordsLixisenatide reduced CM-TAG pool size versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseCM-TAG pool size
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P value (CM-TAG pool size)
    0.046 P
    lixisenatide vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Study one: CM-TAG (but not VLDL-TAG) pool-size was lower with lixisenatide (P = 0.046).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide did not reduce VLDL-TAG pool size versus placebo.

    In plain wordsLixisenatide did not reduce VLDL-TAG pool size versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    No significant changeVLDL-TAG pool size
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Study one: CM-TAG (but not VLDL-TAG) pool-size was lower with lixisenatide (P = 0.046).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide reduced CM oleate concentration AUC versus placebo (P = 0.048).

    In plain wordsLixisenatide reduced CM oleate concentration AUC versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseCM oleate concentration AUC
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P value (CM [13C]oleate AUC60-480min)
    0.048 P
    lixisenatide vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide reduced CM [13C]oleate area under the curve (AUC)60-480min concentration (P = 0.048) and increased CM-TAG clearance, with no effect on CM-TAG production rate.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide increased CM-TAG clearance versus placebo.

    In plain wordsLixisenatide increased CM-TAG clearance versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    IncreaseCM-TAG clearance
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide reduced CM [13C]oleate area under the curve (AUC)60-480min concentration (P = 0.048) and increased CM-TAG clearance, with no effect on CM-TAG production rate.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide did not affect CM-TAG production rate versus placebo.

    In plain wordsLixisenatide did not affect CM-TAG production rate versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    No significant changeCM-TAG production rate
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Lixisenatide reduced CM [13C]oleate area under the curve (AUC)60-480min concentration (P = 0.048) and increased CM-TAG clearance, with no effect on CM-TAG production rate.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide reduced postprandial glucose AUC versus placebo (P = 0.0051).

    In plain wordsLixisenatide reduced postprandial glucose AUC versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial glucose AUC
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P value (postprandial glucose AUC0-240min)
    0.0051 P
    lixisenatide vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Study two: postprandial glucose and insulin AUC0-240min were reduced with lixisenatide (P = 0.0051; P < 0.05).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide reduced postprandial insulin AUC versus placebo (P < 0.05).

    In plain wordsLixisenatide reduced postprandial insulin AUC versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreasePostprandial insulin AUC
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P value (postprandial insulin AUC0-240min)
    < 0.05 P
    lixisenatide vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Study two: postprandial glucose and insulin AUC0-240min were reduced with lixisenatide (P = 0.0051; P < 0.05).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide reduced total glucose production versus placebo (P = 0.015).

    In plain wordsLixisenatide reduced total glucose production versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTotal glucose production
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P value (total glucose production)
    0.015 P
    lixisenatide vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Total glucose production (P = 0.015), rate of glucose appearance from the meal (P = 0.0098), and acetaminophen AUC0-360min (P = 0.006) were lower with lixisenatide than with placebo.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide reduced meal glucose appearance rate versus placebo (P = 0.0098).

    In plain wordsLixisenatide reduced meal glucose appearance rate versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMeal glucose appearance rate
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P value (meal glucose appearance rate)
    0.0098 P
    lixisenatide vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Total glucose production (P = 0.015), rate of glucose appearance from the meal (P = 0.0098), and acetaminophen AUC0-360min (P = 0.006) were lower with lixisenatide than with placebo.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In obese men with diabetes, lixisenatide reduced acetaminophen AUC versus placebo (P = 0.006).

    In plain wordsLixisenatide reduced acetaminophen AUC versus placebo in obese men with diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAcetaminophen AUC
    Study

    n = 8

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal motility · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P value (acetaminophen AUC0-360min)
    0.006 P
    lixisenatide vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Total glucose production (P = 0.015), rate of glucose appearance from the meal (P = 0.0098), and acetaminophen AUC0-360min (P = 0.006) were lower with lixisenatide than with placebo.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
    Summary · context
    Eight obese men with type 2 diabetes [age, 57.3 ± 1.9 years; body mass index, 30.3 ± 1.0 kg/m2; glycosylated hemoglobin, 66.5 ± 2.6 mmol/mol (8.2% ± 0.3%)].
    Summary · context
    Two metabolic studies, 4 weeks after lixisenatide or placebo, with cross-over and repetition of studies.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 4NCT02049034

Lixisenatide-The Effects on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes

University of Surreyn = 8Jan 2014 to Jan 2016

Type 2 Diabetes

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 16 Dec 2024

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.