Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2018

2 results

Neurobiological Mechanisms of Responding to Injustice.

Stallen M, Rossi F, Heijne A, Smidts A, De Dreu CKW, Sanfey AG

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience19 Feb 2018Cited by 63 (Europe PMC)

PMID29459373 (opens in a new tab)PMCIDPMC6596077 (opens in a new tab)DOI10.1523/jneurosci.1242-17.2018 (opens in a new tab)PepBankPUB-29459373
Read at sourcePubMedAsk about this study
Jump to 2 results

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In a punishment and compensation decision task, oxytocin influenced participants' fairness expectations.

    In plain wordsIn a decision task about injustice, oxytocin changed what participants expected to be fair.

    Peptide
    Oxytocin
    Outcome
    Not applicableFairness expectations
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Social behavior and cognition · Nervous system and cognition
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    oxytocin influenced participants' fairness expectations, and in particular enhanced the frequency of low punishments.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In a punishment and compensation decision task, oxytocin enhanced the frequency of low punishments.

    In plain wordsIn a decision task about injustice, oxytocin made participants give low punishments more often.

    Peptide
    Oxytocin
    Outcome
    IncreaseFrequency of low punishments
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Social behavior and cognition · Nervous system and cognition
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    enhanced the frequency of low punishments.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 01:30 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:49 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.