Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 123 · 2017

5 results

Reduction of the cetrorelix dose in a multiple-dose antagonist protocol and its impact on pregnancy rate and affordability: A randomized controlled multicenter study.

Dawood AS, Algergawy A, Elhalwagy A

Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine31 Dec 2017Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study5

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In fertility patients, cetrorelix doses did not differ significantly in FSH requirements (2,350.43±150.76 versus 2,366.25±140.34 IU, p=0.548).

    In plain wordsIn fertility patients, cetrorelix 0.125 mg and 0.25 mg did not differ significantly in FSH requirements.

    Peptide
    Cetrorelix
    Outcome
    No significant changeRecombinant FSH requirement
    Study

    n = 123

    Comparator
    Cetrorelix 0.25 mg
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.125 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    FSH requirement
    2350.43 IU
    0.125 mg
    FSH requirement
    2366.25 IU
    0.25 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The dose of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone units required was 2,350.43±150.76 IU in group I and 2,366.25±140.34 IU in group II, which was not a significant difference (p=0.548).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: group I (n=61) received 0.125 mg of cetrorelix (the study group), and group II (n=62) received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix (the control group).
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In fertility patients, cetrorelix 0.125 mg and 0.25 mg did not differ significantly in stimulation duration, retrieved oocytes or developed embryos.

    In plain wordsIn fertility patients, cetrorelix doses did not differ significantly in stimulation duration, retrieved oocytes or developed embryos.

    Peptide
    Cetrorelix
    Outcome
    No significant changeStimulation duration, retrieved oocytes and developed embryos
    Study

    n = 123

    Comparator
    Cetrorelix 0.25 mg
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.125 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The duration of stimulation, number of retrieved oocytes, and number of developed embryos were not significantly different between the groups.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: group I (n=61) received 0.125 mg of cetrorelix (the study group), and group II (n=62) received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix (the control group).
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In fertility patients, cetrorelix 0.125 mg and 0.25 mg did not differ significantly in clinical pregnancy rates.

    In plain wordsIn fertility patients, cetrorelix 0.125 mg and 0.25 mg did not differ significantly in clinical pregnancy rates.

    Peptide
    Cetrorelix
    Outcome
    No significant changeClinical pregnancy rate
    Study

    n = 123

    Comparator
    Cetrorelix 0.25 mg
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.125 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates likewise did not significantly differ.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: group I (n=61) received 0.125 mg of cetrorelix (the study group), and group II (n=62) received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix (the control group).
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In fertility patients, cetrorelix 0.125 mg and 0.25 mg did not differ significantly in ongoing pregnancy rates.

    In plain wordsIn fertility patients, cetrorelix 0.125 mg and 0.25 mg did not differ significantly in ongoing pregnancy rates.

    Peptide
    Cetrorelix
    Outcome
    No significant changeOngoing pregnancy rate
    Study

    n = 123

    Comparator
    Cetrorelix 0.25 mg
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.125 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates likewise did not significantly differ.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: group I (n=61) received 0.125 mg of cetrorelix (the study group), and group II (n=62) received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix (the control group).
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In fertility patients, cetrorelix 0.125 mg reduced ICSI cycle costs versus 0.25 mg (US $494.66±4.079 versus US $649.677±43.637).

    In plain wordsIn fertility patients, cetrorelix 0.125 mg reduced ICSI cycle costs compared with 0.25 mg.

    Peptide
    Cetrorelix
    Outcome
    DecreaseICSI cost per cycle
    Study

    n = 123

    Comparator
    Cetrorelix 0.25 mg
    Outcome group
    Treatment Costs · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.125 mgAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Cycle cost
    494.66 US dollars
    0.125 mg
    Cycle cost
    649.677 US dollars
    0.25 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The cost of intracytoplasmic sperm injection per cycle was significantly lower in group I than in group II (US $494.66±4.079 vs. US $649.677±43.637).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: group I (n=61) received 0.125 mg of cetrorelix (the study group), and group II (n=62) received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix (the control group).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.