Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 33 · 2018

7 results

Remodeling- and Modeling-Based Bone Formation With Teriparatide Versus Denosumab: A Longitudinal Analysis From Baseline to 3 Months in the AVA Study.

Dempster DW, Zhou H, Recker RR, Brown JP, Recknor CP, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Rao SD, Kendler DL, Lindsay R, Krege JH, Alam J, Taylor KA, Melby TE, Ruff VA

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research15 Nov 2017Cited by 60 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study7

7 results from studies that gave the peptide. 7 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased cancellous remodeling-based bone formation from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased cancellous remodeling-based bone formation compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseCancellous remodeling-based formation
    Study

    n = 33

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 μg/d · subcutaneous · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    All types of formation significantly increased from baseline in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes (differences p < 0.001) with teriparatide (range of changes 2.9- to 21.9-fold), as did MBF in the periosteum (p < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide (n = 33, 20 μg/d) or denosumab (n = 36, 60 mg once/6 months), open-label for 6 months at 7 US and Canadian sites.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received double fluorochrome labeling at baseline and before biopsy at 3 months.
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased cancellous modeling-based bone formation from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased cancellous modeling-based bone formation compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseCancellous modeling-based formation
    Study

    n = 33

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 μg/d · subcutaneous · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    All types of formation significantly increased from baseline in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes (differences p < 0.001) with teriparatide (range of changes 2.9- to 21.9-fold), as did MBF in the periosteum (p < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide (n = 33, 20 μg/d) or denosumab (n = 36, 60 mg once/6 months), open-label for 6 months at 7 US and Canadian sites.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received double fluorochrome labeling at baseline and before biopsy at 3 months.
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased cancellous overflow modeling-based bone formation from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased cancellous overflow modeling-based bone formation compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseCancellous overflow modeling-based formation
    Study

    n = 33

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 μg/d · subcutaneous · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    All types of formation significantly increased from baseline in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes (differences p < 0.001) with teriparatide (range of changes 2.9- to 21.9-fold), as did MBF in the periosteum (p < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide (n = 33, 20 μg/d) or denosumab (n = 36, 60 mg once/6 months), open-label for 6 months at 7 US and Canadian sites.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received double fluorochrome labeling at baseline and before biopsy at 3 months.
  4. 04HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased endocortical remodeling-based bone formation from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased endocortical remodeling-based bone formation compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseEndocortical remodeling-based formation
    Study

    n = 33

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 μg/d · subcutaneous · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    All types of formation significantly increased from baseline in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes (differences p < 0.001) with teriparatide (range of changes 2.9- to 21.9-fold), as did MBF in the periosteum (p < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide (n = 33, 20 μg/d) or denosumab (n = 36, 60 mg once/6 months), open-label for 6 months at 7 US and Canadian sites.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received double fluorochrome labeling at baseline and before biopsy at 3 months.
  5. 05HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased endocortical modeling-based bone formation from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased endocortical modeling-based bone formation compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseEndocortical modeling-based formation
    Study

    n = 33

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 μg/d · subcutaneous · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    All types of formation significantly increased from baseline in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes (differences p < 0.001) with teriparatide (range of changes 2.9- to 21.9-fold), as did MBF in the periosteum (p < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide (n = 33, 20 μg/d) or denosumab (n = 36, 60 mg once/6 months), open-label for 6 months at 7 US and Canadian sites.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received double fluorochrome labeling at baseline and before biopsy at 3 months.
  6. 06HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased endocortical overflow modeling-based bone formation from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased endocortical overflow modeling-based bone formation compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseEndocortical overflow modeling-based formation
    Study

    n = 33

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 μg/d · subcutaneous · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    All types of formation significantly increased from baseline in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes (differences p < 0.001) with teriparatide (range of changes 2.9- to 21.9-fold), as did MBF in the periosteum (p < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide (n = 33, 20 μg/d) or denosumab (n = 36, 60 mg once/6 months), open-label for 6 months at 7 US and Canadian sites.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received double fluorochrome labeling at baseline and before biopsy at 3 months.
  7. 07HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased periosteal modeling-based bone formation from baseline.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased periosteal modeling-based bone formation compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    IncreasePeriosteal modeling-based formation
    Study

    n = 33

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 μg/d · subcutaneous · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    All types of formation significantly increased from baseline in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes (differences p < 0.001) with teriparatide (range of changes 2.9- to 21.9-fold), as did MBF in the periosteum (p < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received subcutaneous teriparatide (n = 33, 20 μg/d) or denosumab (n = 36, 60 mg once/6 months), open-label for 6 months at 7 US and Canadian sites.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received double fluorochrome labeling at baseline and before biopsy at 3 months.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 4Results postedNCT01753856

Effects of Teriparatide or Denosumab on Bone in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Eli Lilly and Companyn = 69Jan 2013 to Jun 2014

Osteoporosis

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.