Skip to content

Study · Measured the body's own peptide · 2016

1 result

Interaction between muscle and bone, and improving the effects of electrical muscle stimulation on amyotrophy and bone loss in a denervation rat model via sciatic neurectomy.

Feng BO, Wu W, Wang H, Wang J, Huang D, Cheng L

Biomedical reports22 Mar 2016Cited by 11 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Natural levels measured1

These results measure the body's own peptide. Nobody was given the peptide. They are not evidence about taking it. They are left out of key results, evidence counts and charts.

  1. 01AnimalEndogenous levelAnimal study (in vivo)Mechanism

    In rats after sciatic neurectomy, electrical muscle stimulation upregulated the body's own MGF mRNA expression compared with no stimulation.

    In plain wordsIn rats with a cut nerve, muscle stimulation raised the body's own MGF gene activity compared with no stimulation.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMGF mRNA expression with electrical muscle stimulation
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Sprague-Dawley rats after sciatic neurectomy
    Comparator
    Non-EMS subgroup
    Outcome group
    Muscle injury and repair · Musculoskeletal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Compared to non-EMS, downregulated myostatin mRNA, and upregulated mechano growth factor (MGF) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) mRNA expression levels were observed in the EMS subgroup (P<0.05).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In the rat model study, groups of 10 Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into EMS and non-EMS subgroups.

    This result measures the body's own MGF / PEG-MGF. Nobody was given the peptide. It is not evidence about taking it.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    13 Oct 2026, 21:44 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    13 Oct 2026, 16:31 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.