Skip to content

Study · In vitro (cells) · 2016

12 results

Molecular Mechanism Underlying the Action of Substituted Pro-Gly Dipeptide Noopept.

Vakhitova YV, Sadovnikov SV, Borisevich SS, Ostrovskaya RU, A Gudasheva T, Seredenin SB

Acta naturae1 Jan 2016Cited by 4 (Europe PMC)

Summary

This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells transiently transfected with luciferase reporter constructs containing sequences for CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, HSF1, and HIF-1. Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1. Noopept provoked an additional increase in the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 when applied in conditions of CoCl2-induced HIF- 1 stabilization. The degree of this HIF-positive effect of Noopept was shown to be concentration-dependent. Piracetam (1 mM) failed to affect significantly any of the TF under study. The results of molecular docking showed that Noopept (L-isomer), as well as its metabolite, L-isomer of N-phenyl-acetylprolyl, unlike its pharmacologically ineffective D-isomer, is able to bind to the active site of prolyl hydroxylase 2. Taking into account the important role of the genes activated by HIF-1 in the formation of an adaptive response to hypoxia, data on the ability of Noopept to provoke a selective increase in the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 explain the wide spectrum of neurochemical and pharmacological effects of Noopept revealed before. The obtained data allow one to propose the HIF-positive effect as the primary mechanism of the activity of this Pro-Gly-containing dipeptide.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study12

11 results from studies that gave the peptide. No result from this study comes from people.

  1. 01LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept increased HIF-1 DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept increased HIF-1 DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    IncreaseHIF-1 DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  2. 02LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept did not affect CREB DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change CREB DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    No significant changeCREB DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  3. 03LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept did not affect NFAT DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change NFAT DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    No significant changeNFAT DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  4. 04LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept did not affect NF-κB DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change NF-κB DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    No significant changeNF-κB DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  5. 05LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept did not affect p53 DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change p53 DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    No significant changep53 DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  6. 06LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept did not affect STAT1 DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change STAT1 DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSTAT1 DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  7. 07LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept did not affect GAS DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change GAS DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    No significant changeGAS DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  8. 08LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept did not affect VDR DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change VDR DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    No significant changeVDR DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  9. 09LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, Noopept did not affect HSF1 DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells, Noopept did not change HSF1 DNA-binding activity.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHSF1 DNA-binding activity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 μMAs given in this study.

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept (10 μM) was shown to increase the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 only, while lacking the ability to affect that of CREB, NFAT, NF-κB, p53, STAT1, GAS, VDR, and HSF1.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  10. 10LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells with CoCl2-stabilized HIF-1, Noopept further increased HIF-1 DNA-binding activity.

    In plain wordsIn cells with CoCl2-stabilized HIF-1, Noopept increased HIF-1 DNA-binding activity further than stabilization alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseHIF-1 activity under CoCl2 stabilization
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Comparator
    CoCl2-induced HIF-1 stabilization without Noopept
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Noopept provoked an additional increase in the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1 when applied in conditions of CoCl2-induced HIF- 1 stabilization.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells
  11. 11LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In HEK293 cells, the HIF-positive effect of Noopept depended on concentration.

    In plain wordsIn cells, the HIF-positive effect of Noopept depended on concentration.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedHIF-1 concentration dependence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    HEK293 cells with transcription-factor luciferase reporters
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The degree of this HIF-positive effect of Noopept was shown to be concentration-dependent.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This study was performed in order to reveal the effect of Noopept (ethyl ester of N-phenylacetyl-Lprolylglycine, GVS-111) on the DNA-binding activity of transcriptional factors (TF) in HEK293 cells

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

  1. 12Computer modelNot a test of Noopept (omberacetam) aloneIn silicoMechanism

    Molecular docking predicted prolyl hydroxylase 2 active-site binding by Noopept L-isomer and its L-isomer metabolite, unlike the ineffective D-isomer.

    In plain wordsComputer modeling predicted that Noopept L-isomer and its L-isomer metabolite could bind prolyl hydroxylase 2, unlike the ineffective D-isomer.

    Outcome
    Not applicableProlyl hydroxylase 2 binding
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Molecular docking
    Comparator
    Pharmacologically ineffective D-isomer
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results of molecular docking showed that Noopept (L-isomer), as well as its metabolite, L-isomer of N-phenyl-acetylprolyl, unlike its pharmacologically ineffective D-isomer, is able to bind to the active site of prolyl hydroxylase 2.

    In this study, Noopept (omberacetam) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Noopept (omberacetam).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    21 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.