In patients with femoral neck fractures, freedom from revision surgery was 84% with teriparatide versus 88% with placebo, without significant difference.
In plain wordsIn patients with hip fractures, freedom from revision surgery did not differ significantly between teriparatide and placebo.
- Peptide
- Teriparatide (PTH 1-34)
- Outcome
- No significant changeNo revision surgery at 12 months
- Study
n = 157
- Comparator
- placebo
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
- Studied dose
- 20 μg/day · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Patients without revision surgery
- 84%
- teriparatide, 12 months
- Patients without revision surgery
- 88%
- placebo, 12 months
Source sentences
After exclusions, the proportion of patients who did not undergo revision surgery at 12 months (primary endpoint) was not different between the study and placebo groups, at 88% in the placebo group (90% CI, 0.79-0.93) versus 84% in the teriparatide group (90% CI, 0.75-0.90; p = 0.743).
2 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
The two prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III studies were designed to evaluate the effect of subcutaneous teriparatide (20 μg/day) for 6 months versus placebo on fracture healing at 24 months.
A total of 159 patients were randomized in the two trials (81 placebo, 78 teriparatide).