Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · 2015

9 results

Treatment satisfaction in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with once-weekly dulaglutide: data from the AWARD-1 and AWARD-3 clinical trials.

Reaney M, Yu M, Lakshmanan M, Pechtner V, van Brunt K

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism27 Jul 2015Cited by 26 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study9

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-1, both dulaglutide doses improved treatment satisfaction more than placebo.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-1, both dulaglutide doses improved treatment satisfaction more than placebo.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAWARD-1 DTSQs versus placebo
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    placebo
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg and 0.75 mg once weekly · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The improvement was significantly greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with placebo (26 weeks) and exenatide (26 and 52 weeks).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In the AWARD-1 study, significant improvements from baseline were observed in total DTSQs score for both dulaglutide doses (26 and 52 weeks) and exenatide (26 weeks).
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-1, both dulaglutide doses improved treatment satisfaction more than exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-1, both dulaglutide doses improved treatment satisfaction more than exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAWARD-1 DTSQs versus exenatide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    exenatide
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg and 0.75 mg once weekly · 26 and 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The improvement was significantly greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with placebo (26 weeks) and exenatide (26 and 52 weeks).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In the AWARD-1 study, significant improvements from baseline were observed in total DTSQs score for both dulaglutide doses (26 and 52 weeks) and exenatide (26 weeks).
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-1, both dulaglutide doses reduced perceived hyperglycaemia more than placebo.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-1, both dulaglutide doses reduced perceived high blood sugar more than placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAWARD-1 perceived hyperglycaemia versus placebo
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    placebo
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg and 0.75 mg once weekly · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The improvement was greater with both dulaglutide doses and exenatide compared with placebo at 26 weeks, and was also greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia was lower for all groups at 26 and 52 weeks compared with baseline.
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.
  4. 04HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-1, both dulaglutide doses reduced perceived hyperglycaemia more than exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-1, both dulaglutide doses reduced perceived high blood sugar more than exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAWARD-1 perceived hyperglycaemia versus exenatide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    exenatide
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg and 0.75 mg once weekly · 26 and 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The improvement was greater with both dulaglutide doses and exenatide compared with placebo at 26 weeks, and was also greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with exenatide at 26 and 52 weeks.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia was lower for all groups at 26 and 52 weeks compared with baseline.
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.
  5. 05HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-3, both dulaglutide doses reduced perceived hyperglycaemia more than metformin at 52 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-3, both dulaglutide doses reduced perceived high blood sugar more than metformin at 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAWARD-3 perceived hyperglycaemia versus metformin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    metformin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg and 0.75 mg once weekly · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia was lower for all groups at 26 and 52 weeks compared with baseline, and this improvement was greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with metformin at 52 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone4

In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  1. 06HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-1, treatment satisfaction improved from baseline with both dulaglutide doses at 26 and 52 weeks and exenatide at 26 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-1, satisfaction improved from baseline with both dulaglutide doses at 26 and 52 weeks and exenatide at 26 weeks.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAWARD-1 DTSQs
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the AWARD-1 study, significant improvements from baseline were observed in total DTSQs score for both dulaglutide doses (26 and 52 weeks) and exenatide (26 weeks).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  2. 07HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-1, perceived hyperglycaemia fell from baseline in all groups, including placebo, at 26 and 52 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-1, perceived high blood sugar fell from baseline in all groups, including placebo, at 26 and 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAWARD-1 perceived hyperglycaemia
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia was lower for all groups at 26 and 52 weeks compared with baseline.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  3. 08HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-3, treatment satisfaction improved from baseline in all groups, including metformin, at 26 and 52 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-3, treatment satisfaction improved from baseline in all groups, including metformin, at 26 and 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAWARD-3 DTSQs
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the AWARD-3 study, significant improvements from baseline were observed for total DTSQs scores in all groups at 26 and 52 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  4. 09HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In AWARD-3, perceived hyperglycaemia fell from baseline in all groups at 26 and 52 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn AWARD-3, perceived high blood sugar fell from baseline in all groups at 26 and 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAWARD-3 perceived hyperglycaemia over time
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia was lower for all groups at 26 and 52 weeks compared with baseline, and this improvement was greater with both dulaglutide doses compared with metformin at 52 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To compare treatment satisfaction among people with type 2 diabetes receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (a once-weekly, long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) with those receiving either exenatide or placebo (AWARD-1 study) or metformin (AWARD-3 study) over 52 weeks.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.