In an unspecified model, GB‑115 drug form No. 2 had relative bioequivalence of 192%, exceeding the parent substance and other forms.
In plain wordsIn an unspecified model, GB‑115 form No. 2 had higher relative bioequivalence than the parent substance and other forms.
- Peptide
- GB-115
- Outcome
- IncreaseRelative bioequivalence of drug form No. 2
- Study
n: not reported in source
- Comparator
- Micronized parent substance and two other drug forms
- Outcome group
- Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology
- Studied dose
- Dose not stated · peroralAs given in this study.
Measurements
- Relative bioequivalence
- 192%
- drug form No. 2
- Bioequivalence
- 53%
- other drug form
- Bioequivalence
- 117%
- other drug form
Source sentences
As a result of the investigations of GB-115 pharmacokinetics, drug form No. 2 (with a relative bioequivalence of 192%) showed advantages in comparison to the micronized parent substance and two other drug forms (bioequivalence, 53 and 117%) and can be recommended for further pharmacological studies.