Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 536 · 2014

10 results

Short-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy versus intermediate-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy, with or without zoledronic acid, in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (TROG 03.04 RADAR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 factorial trial.

Denham JW, Joseph D, Lamb DS, Spry NA, Duchesne G, Matthews J, Atkinson C, Tai KH, Christie D, Kenny L, Turner S, Gogna NK and 5 more

Show all authors

Diamond T, Delahunt B, Oldmeadow C, Attia J, Steigler A

The Lancet. Oncology14 Aug 2014Cited by 88 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study10

10 results from studies that gave the peptide. 10 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, cancer mortality was 7·4% with ITAS versus 4·1% with STAS, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, cancer mortality did not differ between longer and shorter leuprorelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    No significant changeProstate cancer-specific mortality
    Study

    n = 536

    Comparator
    6 months of leuprorelin with radiotherapy (STAS)
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Cancer
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Cumulative incidence of prostate cancer-specific mortality
    7.4%
    ITAS group (leuprorelin 18 months), 95% CI 4·6-11·0
    Cumulative incidence of prostate cancer-specific mortality
    4.1%
    STAS group (leuprorelin 6 months), 95% CI 2·2-7·0

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Cumulative incidences of prostate cancer-specific mortality were 4·1% (95% CI 2·2-7·0) in the STAS group, 7·8% (4·9-11·5) in the STAS plus zoledronic acid group, 7·4% (4·6-11·0) in the ITAS group, and 4·3% (2·3-7·3) in the ITAS plus zoledronic acid group.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Neither prostate cancer-specific mortality nor all-cause mortality differed between control and experimental groups.
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, PSA progression was 29·2% with ITAS versus 34·2% with STAS, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, PSA progression did not differ between longer and shorter leuprorelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    No significant changePSA progression
    Study

    n = 536

    Comparator
    6 months of leuprorelin with radiotherapy (STAS)
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Cumulative incidence of PSA progression
    29.2%
    ITAS group (leuprorelin 18 months), 95% CI 23·8-34·8
    Cumulative incidence of PSA progression
    34.2%
    STAS group (leuprorelin 6 months), 95% CI 28·6-39·9

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Cumulative incidence of PSA progression was 34·2% (28·6-39·9) in the STAS group, 39·6% (33·6-45·5) in the STAS plus zoledronic acid group, 29·2% (23·8-34·8) in the ITAS group, and 26·0% (20·8-31·4) in the ITAS plus zoledronic acid group.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared with STAS, no difference was noted in PSA progression with ITAS or STAS plus zoledronic acid;
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, local progression was 1·5% with ITAS versus 4·1% with STAS, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, local progression did not differ between longer and shorter leuprorelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    No significant changeLocal progression
    Study

    n = 536

    Comparator
    6 months of leuprorelin with radiotherapy (STAS)
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Cumulative incidence of local progression
    1.5%
    ITAS group (leuprorelin 18 months), 95% CI 0·5-3·7
    Cumulative incidence of local progression
    4.1%
    STAS group (leuprorelin 6 months), 95% CI 2·2-7·0

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Cumulative incidence of local progression was 4·1% (2·2-7·0) in the STAS group, 6·1% (3·7-9·5) in the STAS plus zoledronic acid group, 1·5% (0·5-3·7) in the ITAS group, and 3·4% (1·7-6·1) in the ITAS plus zoledronic acid group; no differences were noted between groups.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, bone progression was 8·4% with ITAS versus 7·5% with STAS, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, bone progression did not differ between longer and shorter leuprorelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    No significant changeBone progression
    Study

    n = 536

    Comparator
    6 months of leuprorelin with radiotherapy (STAS)
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Cumulative incidence of bone progression
    8.4%
    ITAS group (leuprorelin 18 months), 95% CI 5·5-12·2
    Cumulative incidence of bone progression
    7.5%
    STAS group (leuprorelin 6 months), 95% CI 4·8-11·1

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Cumulative incidences of bone progression were 7·5% (4·8-11·1), 14·6% (10·6-19·2), 8·4% (5·5-12·2), and 7·6% (4·8-11·2), respectively.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared with STAS, STAS plus zoledronic acid increased the risk of bone progression (SHR 1·90, 95% CI 1·14-3·17; p=0·012), but no differences were noted with the other two groups.
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, distant progression was 14·2% with ITAS versus 14·7% with STAS, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, distant progression did not differ between longer and shorter leuprorelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    No significant changeDistant progression
    Study

    n = 536

    Comparator
    6 months of leuprorelin with radiotherapy (STAS)
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Cumulative incidence of distant progression
    14.2%
    ITAS group (leuprorelin 18 months), 95% CI 10·3-18·7
    Cumulative incidence of distant progression
    14.7%
    STAS group (leuprorelin 6 months), 95% CI 10·7-19·2

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Cumulative incidence of distant progression was 14·7% (10·7-19·2) in the STAS group, 17·3% (13·0-22·1) in the STAS plus zoledronic acid group, 14·2% (10·3-18·7) in the ITAS group, and 11·1% (7·6-15·2) in the ITAS plus zoledronic acid group; no differences were recorded between groups.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, secondary intervention occurred in 20·7% with ITAS versus 25·6% with STAS, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, additional treatment did not differ between longer and shorter leuprorelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    No significant changeSecondary therapeutic intervention
    Study

    n = 536

    Comparator
    6 months of leuprorelin with radiotherapy (STAS)
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Cumulative incidence of secondary therapeutic intervention
    20.7%
    ITAS group (leuprorelin 18 months), 95% CI 16·1-25·9
    Cumulative incidence of secondary therapeutic intervention
    25.6%
    STAS group (leuprorelin 6 months), 95% CI 20·5-30·9

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Cumulative incidence of secondary therapeutic intervention was 25·6% (20·5-30·9), 28·9% (23·5-34·5), 20·7% (16·1-25·9), and 15·3% (11·3-20·0), respectively.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared with STAS, ITAS plus zoledronic acid reduced the need for secondary therapeutic intervention (SHR 0·67, 95% CI 0·48-0·95; p=0·024); no differences were noted with the other two groups.
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, all-cause mortality was 19·4% with ITAS versus 17·0% with STAS, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, overall mortality did not differ between longer and shorter leuprorelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    No significant changeAll-cause mortality
    Study

    n = 536

    Comparator
    6 months of leuprorelin with radiotherapy (STAS)
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Cancer
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality
    19.4%
    ITAS group (leuprorelin 18 months), 95% CI 15·0-24·7
    Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality
    17%
    STAS group (leuprorelin 6 months), 95% CI 13·0-22·1

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 17·0% (13·0-22·1), 18·9% (14·6-24·2), 19·4% (15·0-24·7), and 13·9% (10·3-18·8), respectively.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Neither prostate cancer-specific mortality nor all-cause mortality differed between control and experimental groups.
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, 18 months of androgen suppression did not adversely affect long-term morbidity.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, longer leuprorelin treatment did not worsen long-term illness compared with shorter treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    Direction not reportedLong-term morbidity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Long-term morbidity and quality-of-life scores were not affected adversely by 18 months of androgen suppression or zoledronic acid.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In men with locally advanced prostate cancer, 18 months of androgen suppression did not adversely affect quality-of-life scores.

    In plain wordsIn men with prostate cancer, longer leuprorelin treatment did not worsen quality of life compared with shorter treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    Direction not reportedQuality of life
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Quality of life · Whole body
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Long-term morbidity and quality-of-life scores were not affected adversely by 18 months of androgen suppression or zoledronic acid.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)
  10. 10HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In men with prostate tumors of Gleason score 7 or lower, post-hoc analyses suggested better outcomes with ITAS than STAS.

    In plain wordsIn men with lower Gleason scores, exploratory analyses suggested better outcomes with longer than shorter leuprorelin treatment.

    Peptide
    Leuprolide
    Outcome
    Not applicablePost-hoc outcomes in Gleason score 7 or lower tumors
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    6 months of leuprorelin with radiotherapy (STAS)
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer
    Studied dose
    22·5 mg every 3 months · intramuscular · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Post-hoc analyses suggested that the reductions in PSA progression and decreased need for secondary therapeutic intervention with ITAS plus zoledronic acid were restricted to tumours with a Gleason score of 8-10, and that ITAS was better than STAS in tumours with a Gleason score of 7 or lower.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We did an open-label, randomised, 2 × 2 factorial trial in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (either T2a N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinomas with prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥10 μg/L and a Gleason score of ≥7, or T2b-4 N0 M0 tumours regardless of PSA and Gleason score).
    Summary · context
    Patients in the control group were treated with neoadjuvant androgen suppression with leuprorelin (22·5 mg every 3 months, intramuscularly) for 6 months (short-term) and radiotherapy alone (designated STAS)
    Summary · context
    this procedure was either followed by another 12 months of androgen suppression with leuprorelin (intermediate-term; ITAS)

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3NCT00193856

RADAR Trial - Randomised Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy

Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Groupn = 1,071Oct 2003 to Aug 2017

Prostate Cancer

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 12 Oct 2017

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:37 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.