Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 453 · 2013

13 results

Comparison of parathyroid hormone (1-34) and elcatonin in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: an 18-month randomized, multicenter controlled trial in China.

Li Y, Xuan M, Wang B, Yang J, Zhang H, Zhang XZ, Guo XH, Lü XF, Xue QY, Yang GY, Ji QH, Liu ZM and 5 more

Show all authors

Li CJ, Wu TF, Sheng ZY, Li PQ, Tong JC

Chinese medical journal1 Feb 2013Cited by 19 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study13

13 results from studies that gave the peptide. 13 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, rhPTH increased lumbar BMD more than elcatonin at all reported assessments.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, rhPTH increased lumbar bone density more than elcatonin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseLumbar BMD
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Lumbar BMD increase
    4.3%
    rhPTH at 6 months
    Lumbar BMD increase
    1.9%
    elcatonin at 6 months
    Lumbar BMD increase
    6.8%
    rhPTH at 12 months
    Lumbar BMD increase
    2.7%
    elcatonin at 12 months
    Lumbar BMD increase
    9.5%
    rhPTH at 18 months
    Lumbar BMD increase
    2.9%
    elcatonin at 18 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    rhPTH (1-34) increased lumbar BMD significantly more than did elcatonin after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment (4.3% vs. 1.9%, 6.8% vs. 2.7%, 9.5% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, rhPTH increased serum BSAP more than elcatonin at all reported assessments.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, rhPTH increased a bone formation marker more than elcatonin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSerum BSAP
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Serum BSAP change
    93.7%
    rhPTH at 6 months
    Serum BSAP change
    −3.6%
    elcatonin at 6 months
    Serum BSAP change
    117.8%
    rhPTH at 12 months
    Serum BSAP change
    −4.1%
    elcatonin at 12 months
    Serum BSAP change
    49.2%
    rhPTH at 18 months
    Serum BSAP change
    −5.8%
    elcatonin at 18 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were larger increases in bone turnover markers in the rhPTH (1-34) group than those in the elcatonin group after 6, 12, and 18 months (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) 93.7% vs. -3.6%; 117.8% vs. -4.1%; 49.2% vs. -5.8%, P < 0.01;
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, rhPTH increased urinary CTX/Cr more than elcatonin at all reported assessments.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, rhPTH increased a urinary bone turnover marker more than elcatonin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseUrinary CTX/Cr
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Urinary CTX/Cr change
    250%
    rhPTH at 6 months
    Urinary CTX/Cr change
    −29.5%
    elcatonin at 6 months
    Urinary CTX/Cr change
    330%
    rhPTH at 12 months
    Urinary CTX/Cr change
    −41.4%
    elcatonin at 12 months
    Urinary CTX/Cr change
    273%
    rhPTH at 18 months
    Urinary CTX/Cr change
    −10.6%
    elcatonin at 18 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    urinary C-telopeptide/creatinine (CTX/Cr) 250.0% vs. -29.5%; 330.0% vs. -41.4%, 273.0% vs. -10.6%, P < 0.01).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, rhPTH and elcatonin produced similar pain relief.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, rhPTH and elcatonin produced similar pain relief.

    Outcome
    No significant changePain relief
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Pain · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    rhPTH (1-34) showed similar effect of pain relief as elcatonin.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, clinical fracture incidence did not differ significantly between rhPTH and elcatonin.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, fracture rates did not differ significantly between rhPTH and elcatonin.

    Outcome
    No significant changeClinical fractures
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Clinical fracture incidence
    3.2%
    rhPTH
    Clinical fracture incidence
    5.36%
    elcatonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The incidence of clinical fractures was 5.36% (6/112) in elcatonin group and 3.2% (11/341) in rhPTH (1-34) group (P = 0.303).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, rhPTH and elcatonin were well tolerated.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, rhPTH and elcatonin were well tolerated.

    Outcome
    Not applicableTolerability
    Study

    n = 453

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Both treatments were well tolerated.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In women with osteoporosis, pruritus was more frequent with rhPTH than elcatonin.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, itching was more frequent with rhPTH than elcatonin.

    Outcome
    IncreasePruritus
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Pruritus incidence
    8.2%
    rhPTH
    Pruritus incidence
    2.7%
    elcatonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Pruritus (8.2% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.044) and redness of injection site (4.4% vs. 0, P = 0.024) were more frequent in rhPTH (1-34).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In women with osteoporosis, injection site redness was more frequent with rhPTH than elcatonin.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, injection site redness was more frequent with rhPTH than elcatonin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseInjection site redness
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Injection site redness
    4.4%
    rhPTH
    Injection site redness
    0%
    elcatonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Pruritus (8.2% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.044) and redness of injection site (4.4% vs. 0, P = 0.024) were more frequent in rhPTH (1-34).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In women with osteoporosis, nausea/vomiting was less frequent with rhPTH than elcatonin.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, nausea and vomiting were less frequent with rhPTH than elcatonin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNausea/vomiting
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Nausea/vomiting incidence
    6.2%
    rhPTH
    Nausea/vomiting incidence
    16.1%
    elcatonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Nausea/vomiting (16.1% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.001) and hot flushes (7.1% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001) were more common in elcatonin group.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In women with osteoporosis, hot flushes were less frequent with rhPTH than elcatonin.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, hot flushes were less frequent with rhPTH than elcatonin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHot flushes
    Study

    n = 453

    Comparator
    Elcatonin
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Hot flush incidence
    0.6%
    rhPTH
    Hot flush incidence
    7.1%
    elcatonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Nausea/vomiting (16.1% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.001) and hot flushes (7.1% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001) were more common in elcatonin group.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, rhPTH increased femoral neck BMD after 18 months.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, rhPTH increased femoral neck bone density compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseFemoral neck BMD
    Study

    n = 341

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Femoral neck BMD increase
    2.6%
    rhPTH at 18 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was only a small but significant increase of femoral neck BMD after 18 months (2.6%, P < 0.01) in rhPTH groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The incidence of clinical fractures was 5.36% (6/112) in elcatonin group and 3.2% (11/341) in rhPTH (1-34) group (P = 0.303).
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study. They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  12. 12HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In women receiving rhPTH, transient hypercaluria occurred without clinical symptoms.

    In plain wordsIn women receiving rhPTH, increased urinary calcium was temporary and caused no clinical symptoms.

    Outcome
    Not applicableHypercaluria
    Study

    n = 341

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Kidney and urinary
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Hypercaluria incidence
    9.4%
    rhPTH

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Hypercaluria (9.4%) and hypercalcemia (7.0%) in rhPTH (1-34) group were transient and caused no clinical symptoms.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The incidence of clinical fractures was 5.36% (6/112) in elcatonin group and 3.2% (11/341) in rhPTH (1-34) group (P = 0.303).
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study. They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.
  13. 13HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In women receiving rhPTH, transient hypercalcemia occurred without clinical symptoms.

    In plain wordsIn women receiving rhPTH, increased blood calcium was temporary and caused no clinical symptoms.

    Outcome
    Not applicableHypercalcemia
    Study

    n = 341

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    20 µg daily · 18 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Hypercalcemia incidence
    7%
    rhPTH

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Hypercaluria (9.4%) and hypercalcemia (7.0%) in rhPTH (1-34) group were transient and caused no clinical symptoms.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The incidence of clinical fractures was 5.36% (6/112) in elcatonin group and 3.2% (11/341) in rhPTH (1-34) group (P = 0.303).
    Summary · context
    A total of 453 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in an 18-month, multi-center, randomized, controlled study. They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily for 18 months, or elcatonin 20 U weekly for 12 months.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.