Skip to content

Study · In vitro (cells) · s. aureus, p. aeruginosa and s. maltophilia · 2011

1 result

Antibacterial and anti-biofilm effects of cathelicidin peptides against pathogens isolated from cystic fibrosis patients.

Pompilio A, Scocchi M, Pomponio S, Guida F, Di Primio A, Fiscarelli E, Gennaro R, Di Bonaventura G

Peptides7 Aug 2011Cited by 80 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

1 result from studies that gave the peptide. No result from this study comes from people.

  1. 01LabIn vitro (cells)Activity measurement

    In vitro, LL‑37 showed no significant antimicrobial activity against cystic fibrosis isolates of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia (MIC50 above 32 μg/ml).

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, LL‑37 did not kill bacteria taken from cystic fibrosis lungs at the doses tested.

    Peptide
    LL-37
    Outcome
    No significant changeAntibacterial activity (MIC50) against cystic fibrosis isolates
    Study

    S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, S. maltophilian: not reported in source

    Strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients
    Comparator
    Tobramycin
    Outcome group
    Infection and antimicrobial activity · Infection
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    MIC50
    > 32 μg/ml
    cystic fibrosis isolates

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In contrast, indolicidin, LL-37, and Bac7(1-35) showed no significant antimicrobial activity (MIC(50)>32μg/ml).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Six different cathelicidin-derived peptides were compared to tobramycin for antibacterial and anti-biofilm effects against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and S. maltophilia strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:50 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:03 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:58 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.