Skip to content

Study · Measured the body's own peptide · 2010

1 result

Comparison of vasopressin and oxytocin expressions in the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system of patients with chronic heart failure.

Sivukhina EV, Morozov IuE, Dolzhikov AA, Jirikowski GF, Grinevich V

Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme11 Aug 2009Cited by 12 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Natural levels measured1

These results measure the body's own peptide. Nobody was given the peptide. They are not evidence about taking it. They are left out of key results, evidence counts and charts.

  1. 01HumanEndogenous levelObservational studyOther

    In postmortem tissue of men with chronic heart failure, oxytocin neurons showed no statistically significant difference from controls.

    In plain wordsIn men who died of chronic heart failure, the body's own oxytocin in brain tissue did not differ from controls.

    Peptide
    Oxytocin
    Outcome
    No significant changeOxytocin neuron immunoreactivity in hypothalamus and posterior pituitary
    Study

    n = 17

    Comparator
    Controls without chronic heart failure
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In contrast, the similar analysis applied for oxytocin neurons revealed no statistically significant differences to controls.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Here we present a postmortem analysis of vasopressin and oxytocin-immunoreactive neurons and their terminals in the posterior pituitary of 8 male patients (53.8+/-9.3 years) who had died from CHF and 9 male controls (54.6+/-11.8 years).

    This result measures the body's own Oxytocin. Nobody was given the peptide. It is not evidence about taking it.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 01:30 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:50 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.