Skip to content

Study · Measured the body's own peptide · 2009

1 result

SELDI-TOF-MS of gingival crevicular fluid--a methodological approach.

Dommisch H, Vorderwülbecke S, Eberhard J, Steglich M, Jepsen S

Archives of oral biology24 Jun 2009Cited by 21 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Natural levels measured1

These results measure the body's own peptide. Nobody was given the peptide. They are not evidence about taking it. They are left out of key results, evidence counts and charts.

  1. 01HumanEndogenous levelObservational studyOther

    In gingival crevicular fluid, donors had significantly higher intensity of peaks matching the mass of the body's own LL‑37 at inflamed sites than at healthy sites.

    In plain wordsGum fluid from inflamed sites had higher levels of the body's own LL‑37 than healthy sites.

    Peptide
    LL-37
    Outcome
    IncreaseLL-37 peak intensity in GCF, inflamed versus healthy sites
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Healthy periodontal sites
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Donors that demonstrated significantly higher intensity peaks corresponding to the mass of LL-37 (p=0.01) also tended to show greater intensity peaks corresponding to the masses of HNP-1 and HNP-2 in samples from inflamed compared to healthy periodontal sites.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    GCF samples were collected from patients showing healthy periodontal sites and sites with early signs of inflammation (gingivitis), but with no pocket depth greater than 4 mm.

    This result measures the body's own LL-37. Nobody was given the peptide. It is not evidence about taking it.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:50 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:03 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.