In patients with symptomatic BPH, peak mean IPSS change was -5.4 to -5.9 with cetrorelix versus -2.8 with placebo.
In plain wordsIn patients with BPH, symptom scores fell more with cetrorelix (peak change -5.4 to -5.9) than with placebo (-2.8).
- Peptide
- Cetrorelix
- Outcome
- DecreasePeak IPSS improvement
- Study
n: not reported in source
- Comparator
- Placebo
- Outcome group
- Urinary continence and bladder function · Kidney and urinary
- Studied dose
- 5 mg weekly x4, 10 mg every 2 weeks x2, or 10 mg weekly x4 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Peak mean IPSS change
- −5.4 to −5.9 IPSS
- cetrorelix groups
- Peak mean IPSS change
- −2.8 IPSS
- placebo
Source sentences
In all CET groups a rapid improvement in mean IPSS was obtained, with a peak effect of -5.4 to -5.9 (placebo: -2.8).
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
After all dosages of CET given, changes from baseline and differences to placebo were statistically significant up to week 20.
After a run-in period with 4 weekly injections of placebo, 140 patients with an international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) > or =13 and a peak urinary flow rate (PFR) 5-13ml/s were randomly allocated to 4 treatment groups; patients with residual urine volume of >350ml were excluded.
Patients received either CET at dosages of 5mg/wkx4, 10mg/2 wkx2 or 10mg/wkx4 or placebo.