Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2006

3 results

Cost-effectiveness of chronic hepatitis C treatment with thymosin alpha-1.

García-Contreras F, Nevárez-Sida A, Constantino-Casas P, Abud-Bastida F, Garduño-Espinosa J

Archives of medical research1 Jul 2006Cited by 12 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study3

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone3

In this study, Thymosin alpha-1 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Thymosin alpha-1.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Thymosin alpha-1 aloneOther designOther

    In a Mexican model of chronic hepatitis C, triple therapy (peginterferon, ribavirin and thymosin alpha‑1) had lower cost and higher utility than peginterferon plus ribavirin, peginterferon alone and no treatment.

    In plain wordsIn a cost model for hepatitis C, a three-drug regimen that includes thymosin alpha‑1 cost less and gave more benefit than the other options.

    Outcome
    MixedCost and utility of triple therapy versus other options
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Peginterferon plus ribavirin, peginterferon alone, no treatment
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Infection

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Triple therapy (peginterferon plus ribavirin plus thymosin alpha-1) was dominant with lower cost and higher utility in relationship with peginterferon + ribavirin option, peginterferon alone and no-treatment option.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The objective of the study was to determine the most cost-effective treatment against HCV among the following: peginterferon, peginterferon plus ribavirin, peginterferon plus ribavirin plus thymosin, and no treatment.
    Summary · context
    We carried out cost-effectiveness analysis using the institutional perspective, including a 45-year time frame and a 3% discount rate for costs and effectiveness.

    In this study, Thymosin alpha-1 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Thymosin alpha-1.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Thymosin alpha-1 aloneOther designOther

    In the model, the cost per unit of success was 1,908 USD/QALY for triple therapy with thymosin alpha‑1, 2,277 for peginterferon plus ribavirin, 2,929 for peginterferon alone and 4,204 for no treatment.

    In plain wordsIn the cost model, the regimen with thymosin alpha‑1 had the lowest cost per quality-adjusted life year of the four options.

    Outcome
    Not applicableCost per QALY of triple therapy
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Peginterferon plus ribavirin, peginterferon alone, no treatment
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Infection

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In triple therapy the cost per unit of success was of 1,908 [USD/quality-adjusted life years (QALY)] compared with peginterferon plus ribavirin 2,277/QALY, peginterferon alone 2,929/QALY, and no treatment 4,204/QALY.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The objective of the study was to determine the most cost-effective treatment against HCV among the following: peginterferon, peginterferon plus ribavirin, peginterferon plus ribavirin plus thymosin, and no treatment.
    Summary · context
    We carried out cost-effectiveness analysis using the institutional perspective, including a 45-year time frame and a 3% discount rate for costs and effectiveness.

    In this study, Thymosin alpha-1 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Thymosin alpha-1.

  3. 03HumanNot a test of Thymosin alpha-1 aloneOther designOther

    Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case cost-effectiveness result for the triple regimen that includes thymosin alpha‑1.

    In plain wordsTests of the model assumptions supported the cost result for the regimen that includes thymosin alpha‑1.

    Outcome
    Not applicableRobustness of base case to sensitivity analysis
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Infection

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The objective of the study was to determine the most cost-effective treatment against HCV among the following: peginterferon, peginterferon plus ribavirin, peginterferon plus ribavirin plus thymosin, and no treatment.
    Summary · context
    We carried out cost-effectiveness analysis using the institutional perspective, including a 45-year time frame and a 3% discount rate for costs and effectiveness.

    In this study, Thymosin alpha-1 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Thymosin alpha-1.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    10 Oct 2026, 08:55 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:03 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:02 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.