Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2006

15 results

Effects of teriparatide, alendronate, or both on bone turnover in osteoporotic men.

Finkelstein JS, Leder BZ, Burnett SM, Wyland JJ, Lee H, de la Paz AV, Gibson K, Neer RM

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism9 May 2006Cited by 90 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study15

9 results from studies that gave the peptide. 9 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men receiving teriparatide alone, serum N-telopeptide rose initially and then declined toward baseline.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, teriparatide alone first increased serum N-telopeptide, which later declined toward baseline.

    Outcome
    MixedSerum N-telopeptide trajectory with monotherapy
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In men receiving teriparatide monotherapy (group 2), levels of all bone turnover markers increased markedly during the first 6 months of teriparatide administration and then declined toward baseline during the next 18 months.
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men receiving teriparatide alone, osteocalcin rose initially and then declined toward baseline.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, teriparatide alone first increased osteocalcin, which later declined toward baseline.

    Outcome
    MixedOsteocalcin trajectory with monotherapy
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In men receiving teriparatide monotherapy (group 2), levels of all bone turnover markers increased markedly during the first 6 months of teriparatide administration and then declined toward baseline during the next 18 months.
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men receiving teriparatide alone, procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide rose initially and then declined toward baseline.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, teriparatide alone first increased a procollagen marker, which later declined toward baseline.

    Outcome
    MixedProcollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide trajectory with monotherapy
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In men receiving teriparatide monotherapy (group 2), levels of all bone turnover markers increased markedly during the first 6 months of teriparatide administration and then declined toward baseline during the next 18 months.
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, N-telopeptide changes differed significantly between teriparatide monotherapy and alendronate monotherapy.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, N-telopeptide changes differed between teriparatide alone and alendronate alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedN-telopeptide change versus alendronate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Alendronate alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.001 NA
    groups 1 and 2

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, osteocalcin changes differed significantly between teriparatide monotherapy and alendronate monotherapy.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, osteocalcin changes differed between teriparatide alone and alendronate alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedOsteocalcin change versus alendronate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Alendronate alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.001 NA
    groups 1 and 2

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide changes differed significantly between teriparatide alone and alendronate alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, procollagen marker changes differed between teriparatide alone and alendronate alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedProcollagen propeptide change versus alendronate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Alendronate alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.001 NA
    groups 1 and 2

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, N-telopeptide changes differed significantly between teriparatide plus alendronate and alendronate alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, N-telopeptide changes differed between teriparatide plus alendronate and alendronate alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedN-telopeptide change with addition to alendronate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Alendronate alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.001 NA
    groups 1 and 3

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, osteocalcin changes differed significantly between teriparatide plus alendronate and alendronate alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, osteocalcin changes differed between teriparatide plus alendronate and alendronate alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedOsteocalcin change with addition to alendronate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Alendronate alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.001 NA
    groups 1 and 3

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide changes differed significantly between teriparatide plus alendronate and alendronate alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, procollagen marker changes differed between teriparatide plus alendronate and alendronate alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedProcollagen propeptide change with addition to alendronate
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Alendronate alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    37 microg daily · sc · begun at month 6 of a 30-month studyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.001 NA
    groups 1 and 3

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone6

In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

  1. 10HumanNot a test of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, N-telopeptide returned to baseline after teriparatide joined alendronate, following an initial decline during alendronate alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, N-telopeptide returned to baseline after teriparatide joined alendronate, following a decline during alendronate alone.

    Outcome
    MixedSerum N-telopeptide after combination therapy
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In men who received combination therapy (group 3), bone turnover marker levels declined in the first 6 months (while receiving alendronate alone) and then returned to baseline levels (N-telopeptide) or above (osteocalcin and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen) after teriparatide was added.
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.

    In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

  2. 11HumanNot a test of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, osteocalcin rose above baseline after teriparatide joined alendronate, following an initial decline during alendronate alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, osteocalcin rose above baseline after teriparatide joined alendronate, following a decline during alendronate alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseOsteocalcin after combination therapy
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In men who received combination therapy (group 3), bone turnover marker levels declined in the first 6 months (while receiving alendronate alone) and then returned to baseline levels (N-telopeptide) or above (osteocalcin and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen) after teriparatide was added.
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.

    In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

  3. 12HumanNot a test of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide rose above baseline after teriparatide joined alendronate.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, a procollagen marker rose above baseline after teriparatide joined alendronate.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProcollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide after combination therapy
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In men who received combination therapy (group 3), bone turnover marker levels declined in the first 6 months (while receiving alendronate alone) and then returned to baseline levels (N-telopeptide) or above (osteocalcin and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen) after teriparatide was added.
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.

    In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

  4. 13HumanNot a test of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, N-telopeptide changes differed significantly between teriparatide plus alendronate and teriparatide alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, N-telopeptide changes differed between teriparatide plus alendronate and teriparatide alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedN-telopeptide change with combination versus teriparatide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Teriparatide alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.03 NA
    groups 2 and 3

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.

    In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

  5. 14HumanNot a test of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, osteocalcin changes differed significantly between teriparatide plus alendronate and teriparatide alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, osteocalcin changes differed between teriparatide plus alendronate and teriparatide alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedOsteocalcin change with combination versus teriparatide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Teriparatide alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.03 NA
    groups 2 and 3

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.

    In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

  6. 15HumanNot a test of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In osteoporotic men, procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide changes differed significantly between teriparatide plus alendronate and teriparatide alone.

    In plain wordsIn men with osteoporosis, procollagen marker changes differed between teriparatide plus alendronate and teriparatide alone.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedProcollagen propeptide change with combination versus teriparatide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Teriparatide alone
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.03 NA
    groups 2 and 3

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months.
    Summary · context
    Teriparatide was begun at month 6.
    Summary · context
    The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.

    In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.