Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 63 · 2006

10 results

Teriparatide vs. calcitonin in the treatment of Asian postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis.

Hwang JS, Tu ST, Yang TS, Chen JF, Wang CJ, Tsai KS

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA19 Jan 2006Cited by 33 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study10

8 results from studies that gave the peptide. 8 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Taiwanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased spinal BMD more than calcitonin.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, teriparatide increased spinal bone density more than calcitonin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseLumbar spine BMD
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Salmon calcitonin 100 IU daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 microg daily · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Spinal BMD increase
    4.5%
    teriparatide
    Spinal BMD increase
    0.1%
    calcitonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results at 6 months showed that patients using teriparatide had larger mean increases in spinal BMD than those who used calcitonin (4.5% vs. 0.1%), but the BMD changes in these two groups at the femoral neck and the total hip were not significant.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In these women, teriparatide increased bone specific alkaline phosphatase more than calcitonin.

    In plain wordsIn these women, teriparatide increased a bone formation marker more than calcitonin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseBone specific alkaline phosphatase
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Salmon calcitonin 100 IU daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 microg daily · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Bone specific alkaline phosphatase increase
    142%
    teriparatide
    Bone specific alkaline phosphatase increase
    37%
    calcitonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were also larger mean increases in bone markers in the teriparatide group than in the calcitonin group (bone specific alkaline phosphatase 142% vs. 37%; osteocalcin 154% vs. 23%).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In these women, teriparatide increased osteocalcin more than calcitonin.

    In plain wordsIn these women, teriparatide increased osteocalcin more than calcitonin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseOsteocalcin
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Salmon calcitonin 100 IU daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    20 microg daily · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Osteocalcin increase
    154%
    teriparatide
    Osteocalcin increase
    23%
    calcitonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were also larger mean increases in bone markers in the teriparatide group than in the calcitonin group (bone specific alkaline phosphatase 142% vs. 37%; osteocalcin 154% vs. 23%).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, salmon calcitonin produced a smaller spinal BMD increase than teriparatide at 6 months (0.1% versus 4.5%).

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, salmon calcitonin produced a smaller spinal bone density increase than teriparatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseLumbar spine BMD change
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Teriparatide 20 microg daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    100 IU daily · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Spinal BMD change
    0.1%
    calcitonin
    Spinal BMD change
    4.5%
    teriparatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results at 6 months showed that patients using teriparatide had larger mean increases in spinal BMD than those who used calcitonin (4.5% vs. 0.1%), but the BMD changes in these two groups at the femoral neck and the total hip were not significant.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, femoral neck BMD changes between the salmon calcitonin and teriparatide groups were not significant at 6 months.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, femoral neck bone density changes were not significant between the salmon calcitonin and teriparatide groups.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFemoral neck BMD change
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Teriparatide 20 microg daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    100 IU daily · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results at 6 months showed that patients using teriparatide had larger mean increases in spinal BMD than those who used calcitonin (4.5% vs. 0.1%), but the BMD changes in these two groups at the femoral neck and the total hip were not significant.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, total hip BMD changes between the salmon calcitonin and teriparatide groups were not significant at 6 months.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, total hip bone density changes were not significant between the salmon calcitonin and teriparatide groups.

    Outcome
    No significant changeTotal hip BMD change
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Teriparatide 20 microg daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    100 IU daily · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results at 6 months showed that patients using teriparatide had larger mean increases in spinal BMD than those who used calcitonin (4.5% vs. 0.1%), but the BMD changes in these two groups at the femoral neck and the total hip were not significant.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, salmon calcitonin produced a smaller bone-specific alkaline phosphatase increase than teriparatide (37% versus 142%).

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, salmon calcitonin increased bone-specific alkaline phosphatase less than teriparatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBone-specific alkaline phosphatase change
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Teriparatide 20 microg daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    100 IU daily · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase change
    37%
    calcitonin
    Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase change
    142%
    teriparatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were also larger mean increases in bone markers in the teriparatide group than in the calcitonin group (bone specific alkaline phosphatase 142% vs. 37%; osteocalcin 154% vs. 23%).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, salmon calcitonin produced a smaller osteocalcin increase than teriparatide (23% versus 154%).

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, salmon calcitonin increased osteocalcin less than teriparatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseOsteocalcin change
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Teriparatide 20 microg daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    100 IU daily · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Osteocalcin change
    23%
    calcitonin
    Osteocalcin change
    154%
    teriparatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were also larger mean increases in bone markers in the teriparatide group than in the calcitonin group (bone specific alkaline phosphatase 142% vs. 37%; osteocalcin 154% vs. 23%).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

  1. 09HumanNot a test of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis, femoral neck BMD changes at 6 months were not significant in the teriparatide and calcitonin groups.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, femoral neck bone density changes at 6 months were not significant in the teriparatide and calcitonin groups.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFemoral neck BMD
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Salmon calcitonin 100 IU daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results at 6 months showed that patients using teriparatide had larger mean increases in spinal BMD than those who used calcitonin (4.5% vs. 0.1%), but the BMD changes in these two groups at the femoral neck and the total hip were not significant.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.

    In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

  2. 10HumanNot a test of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis, total hip BMD changes at 6 months were not significant in the teriparatide and calcitonin groups.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, total hip bone density changes at 6 months were not significant in the teriparatide and calcitonin groups.

    Outcome
    No significant changeTotal hip BMD
    Study

    n = 63

    Comparator
    Salmon calcitonin 100 IU daily
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results at 6 months showed that patients using teriparatide had larger mean increases in spinal BMD than those who used calcitonin (4.5% vs. 0.1%), but the BMD changes in these two groups at the femoral neck and the total hip were not significant.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This study compared the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis in Taiwan.
    Summary · context
    This 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled 63 women with established osteoporosis.
    Summary · context
    They were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 microg or calcitonin 100 IU daily in an open-label fashion.

    In this study, Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Teriparatide (PTH 1-34).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  2. Version 2

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  3. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.