Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2001

1 result

[Analysis of the content of ten kinds of metal elements in cerebrolysin by atomic absorption spectrophotometry].

Liu W, Leng H, Zhu Z, Chen G

Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu1 Jun 2001Cited by 1 (Europe PMC)

PMID12947679 (opens in a new tab)PepBankPUB-12947679

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Cerebrolysin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Cerebrolysin.

  1. 01LabNot a test of Cerebrolysin aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    In Cerebrolysin preparations, metal element content differed significantly between seven Chinese products and the Austrian product.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, metal content differed between Chinese Cerebrolysin products and the Austrian product.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedMetal element content across products
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Eight Cerebrolysin brands
    Comparator
    Austrian Cerebrolysin product
    Outcome group
    Product quality and purity · Pharmacology

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The statistical results as follows: the metal elements have significant difference between in seven kinds of Chinese products and in the cerebrolysin made by Austria.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    The contents of Mg, K, Ca, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn in eight different brand cerbrolysins were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry.

    In this study, Cerebrolysin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Cerebrolysin.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    14 Oct 2026, 05:02 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    14 Oct 2026, 01:46 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.