In women undergoing IVF, total hMG dosage was 39.8±14.2 ampoules with nafarelin versus 37.5±16.1 with buserelin, without significant group differences.
In plain wordsTotal stimulation medication use was similar with nafarelin and buserelin in IVF.
- Peptide
- Nafarelin
- Outcome
- IncreaseTotal hMG dosage
- Study
n: not reported in source
- Comparator
- Buserelin
- Outcome group
- Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
- Studied dose
- 400 microg twice daily · intranasalAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- mean total hMG dosage
- 39.8 ampoules
- nafarelin group
- SD of mean total hMG dosage
- 14.2 ampoules
- nafarelin group
- mean total hMG dosage
- 37.5 ampoules
- buserelin group
- SD of mean total hMG dosage
- 16.1 ampoules
- buserelin group
Source sentences
mean (+/-S.D.) total dosage of hMG (ampoules) (37.5+/-16.1: Group B, 39.8+/-14.2: Group N versus 41.9+/-12.6: Group L) and mean daily dosage of hMG (ampoules) (3.1: Group B, 2.8: Group N versus 3.0: Group L) seen were not statistically significantly different.
2 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
The efficacy and safety of short acting buserelin and nafarelin intranasal spray were compared to long acting leuprorelin depot intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in this prospective study of 157 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in-vitro fertilisation (IVF).
Patients were allocated to three groups to receive buserelin 150 microg nasal spray three times daily (Group B), nafarelin nasal spray 400 microg twice daily (Group N), or leuprorelin depot 3.75 mg once by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection (Group L) for pituitary desensitisation prior to comme…