In cell assays with alanine and D-amino acid scanning, the VIP pharmacophore for VPAC(1) differed between species.
In plain wordsIn lab tests, the parts of VIP that matter for binding to its receptor differed between species.
- Outcome
- Not applicableSpecies differences in the VIP pharmacophore for VPAC(1)
- Study
human, rat, guinea pign: not reported in source
CHO and PANC1 cells with VPAC(1); T47D cells with native VPAC(1)- Outcome group
- Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
Source sentences
Important species differences existed in the VIP pharmacophore.
2 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
To address this issue we investigated the VIP pharmacophore for VPAC(1) (the predominant receptor subtype in cancers and widely distributed in normal tissues) by using alanine and D-amino acid scanning.
Interaction with rat, guinea pig, and human VPAC(1) was assessed using transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) and PANC1 cells and cells possessing native VPAC(1).
In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).