Determination of growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

Choi SJ, Lee HY, Kim SB, Kim JH, Lee SS, Yoo SD, Lee KC, Lee HS

Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications1 Apr 2001Cited by 1 (Europe PMC)

PMID11339289DOI10.1016/s0378-4347(01)00030-5PepBankPUB-11339289

Publisher page PubMedAsk about this study

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study3

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone3

In this study, GHRP-6 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking GHRP-6.

01LabNot a test of GHRP-6 aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other
In an analytical assay, GHRP‑6 separated on a reversed-phase CN column with an acetonitrile-phosphate mobile phase.
In plain wordsIn lab tests, the assay separated GHRP‑6 on a reversed-phase column.
Peptide
GHRP-6
Outcome
Not applicableChromatographic separation
Study
n: not reported in source
HPLC with electrochemical detection
Outcome group
Analytical methods and detection · Pharmacology
Source sentences
Summary
GHRP-6 was separated on a reversed-phase CN column with 37% acetonitrile in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) as the mobile phase.
In this study, GHRP-6 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking GHRP-6.
Report a problemFND-1133928901
02LabNot a test of GHRP-6 aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other
In an analytical assay, the optimum GHRP‑6 oxidation signal occurred at 0.85 V versus Ag/AgCl.
In plain wordsIn lab tests, GHRP‑6 gave its best oxidation signal at 0.85 V versus Ag/AgCl.
Peptide
GHRP-6
Outcome
Not applicableOptimum oxidation signal
Study
n: not reported in source
HPLC with electrochemical detection
Outcome group
Analytical methods and detection · Pharmacology
Measurements
Oxidation potential
0.85 V
versus Ag/AgCl
Source sentences
Summary
The optimum electrochemical oxidation signal was obtained at 0.85 V vs. Ag/AgCl in a glassy carbon working electrode due to two electroactive tryptophans and a histidine residue.
In this study, GHRP-6 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking GHRP-6.
Report a problemFND-1133928902
03LabNot a test of GHRP-6 aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other
In serum samples, the GHRP‑6 assay operated over a concentration range of 5 to 100 ng/ml.
In plain wordsIn lab tests, the assay measured GHRP‑6 in serum over a range of 5 to 100 ng/ml.
Peptide
GHRP-6
Outcome
Not applicableSerum analytical concentration range
Study
n: not reported in source
HPLC with electrochemical detection
Outcome group
Analytical methods and detection · Pharmacology
Measurements
Concentration range
5 to 100 ng/ml
serum analyte
Source sentences
Summary
Solid-phase extraction using octadecyl cartridges was optimized for sample cleanup of GHRP-6 from serum samples and the method was successfully applied over the concentration range of 5 to 100 ng/ml of analyte. reserved.
In this study, GHRP-6 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking GHRP-6.
Report a problemFND-1133928903

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

Version 2Current
21 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC
Study results updated
Version 1
9 Oct 2026, 03:13 UTC
First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

Publication types

MeSH terms

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.