Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2000

2 results

The efficacy of octreotide in the therapy of severe nonproliferative and early proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized controlled study.

Grant MB, Mames RN, Fitzgerald C, Hazariwala KM, Cooper-DeHoff R, Caballero S, Estes KS

Diabetes care1 Apr 2000Cited by 108 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In advanced diabetic retinopathy, 1 of 22 octreotide-treated eyes versus 9 of 24 control eyes required PRP; independent-event analysis gave P < 0.006.

    In plain wordsIn advanced diabetic retinopathy, 1 of 22 eyes with octreotide versus 9 of 24 control eyes required laser treatment.

    Peptide
    Octreotide
    Outcome
    DecreaseHigh-risk retinopathy requiring photocoagulation
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Conventional diabetes management
    Outcome group
    Vision and retina · Eye
    Studied dose
    200-5,000 microg/day · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Eyes reaching high-risk PDR requiring PRP
    1 eyes
    octreotide arm, of 22
    Eyes requiring PRP
    9 eyes
    control arm, of 24

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Only 1 of 22 eyes from patients treated with octreotide reached high-risk PDR requiring PRP, compared with control patients, in whom 9 of 24 eyes required PRP.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The decreased incidence of progression requiring laser surgery was statistically significant if events were considered independently (P < 0.006).
    Summary · context
    Patients with severe nonproliferative DR (NPDR) or early non-high-risk proliferative DR (PDR) were randomly assigned to conventional diabetes management (control group, 12 patients) or to treatment with maximally tolerated doses of octreotide (200-5,000 microg/day subcutaneously; 11 patients).
    Summary · context
    Ocular changes in each eye were assessed at a minimum of every 3 months for 15 months or until disease progressed to high-risk PDR requiring laser surgery.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In advanced diabetic retinopathy, progression occurred in 27% with octreotide versus 42% with conventional management; repeated-measures analysis gave P = 0.0605.

    In plain wordsIn advanced diabetic retinopathy, progression occurred in 27% with octreotide versus 42% with conventional care; the difference approached significance.

    Peptide
    Octreotide
    Outcome
    DecreaseOcular disease progression
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Conventional diabetes management
    Outcome group
    Vision and retina · Eye
    Studied dose
    200-5,000 microg/day · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Ocular disease progression incidence
    27%
    octreotide arm
    Ocular disease progression incidence
    42%
    conventional diabetes management arm

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The incidence of ocular disease progression was only 27% in patients treated with octreotide compared with 42% in patients with conventional diabetes management.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This treatment effect on whether the retina worsened approached statistical significance using repeated measures analysis (P = 0.0605).
    Summary · context
    Patients with severe nonproliferative DR (NPDR) or early non-high-risk proliferative DR (PDR) were randomly assigned to conventional diabetes management (control group, 12 patients) or to treatment with maximally tolerated doses of octreotide (200-5,000 microg/day subcutaneously; 11 patients).
    Summary · context
    Ocular changes in each eye were assessed at a minimum of every 3 months for 15 months or until disease progressed to high-risk PDR requiring laser surgery.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.