Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 1997

1 result

Modulation by APGW-amide, an Achatina endogenous inhibitory tetrapeptide, of currents induced by neuroactive compounds on Achatina neurons: peptides.

Han XY, Salunga TL, Zhang W, Takeuchi H, Matsunami K

General pharmacology1 Oct 1997Cited by 4 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Oxytocin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Oxytocin.

  1. 01LabNot a test of Oxytocin aloneEx vivo tissueMechanism

    In Achatina PON neurons, the inward current induced by oxytocin was not affected by APGW-amide.

    In plain wordsIn snail neurons in the lab, APGW-amide did not change the current caused by oxytocin.

    Peptide
    Oxytocin
    Outcome
    No significant changeOxytocin-induced inward current on PON with APGW-amide
    Study

    Achatina (snail)n: not reported in source

    Achatina giant neuron PON, voltage clamp
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Nervous system and cognition

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Iin induced by oxytocin on PON was not affected by APGW-amide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Modulatory effects of APGW-amide (Ala-Pro-Gly-Trp-NH2), proposed as an inhibitory neurotransmitter of Achatina neurons, perfused at 3 x 10(-6) M on the currents induced by neuroactive peptides, ejected by brief pressure, were examined by using Achatina giant neuron types, v-RCDN (ventral-right cereb…

    In this study, Oxytocin was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Oxytocin.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 20:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:54 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.