Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 1996

2 results

Interaction between the insulin-like growth factor family and the integrin receptor family in tissue repair processes. Evidence in a rabbit ear dermal ulcer model.

Galiano RD, Zhao LL, Clemmons DR, Roth SI, Lin X, Mustoe TA

The Journal of clinical investigation1 Dec 1996Cited by 52 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-I) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-I).

  1. 01AnimalNot a test of IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-I) aloneAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rabbit ear wounds, des(1‑3)IGF-I with IGFBP-1 did not improve reepithelialization over controls.

    In plain wordsIn rabbits, des(1‑3)IGF-I with IGFBP-1 did not improve wound surface repair compared with controls.

    Outcome
    No significant changeReepithelialization
    Study

    rabbitn: not reported in source

    Rabbit ear full-thickness dermal wounds
    Comparator
    Controls
    Outcome group
    Wound healing · Skin and wound

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The same doses of IGF-I/WGD-IGFBP-1, des(1-3)IGF-I/IGFBP-1, and IGF-I/IGFBP-2 were ineffective.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Only native IGF-I in combination with native IGFBP-1 was effective as a wound healing agent, enhancing reepithelialization and granulation tissue deposition by 64+/-5 and 83+/-12% over controls (P = 0.008 and 0.016, respectively).
    Summary · context
    Full-thickness dermal wounds were created on rabbit ears; various combinations of native IGF-I, native IGFBP-1, native IGFBP-2, and their respective analogues/mutants were applied to each wound.
    Summary · context
    Wounds were harvested 7 d later for analysis.

    In this study, IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-I) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-I).

  2. 02AnimalNot a test of IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-I) aloneAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rabbit ear wounds, des(1‑3)IGF-I with IGFBP-1 did not improve granulation tissue deposition over controls.

    In plain wordsIn rabbits, des(1‑3)IGF-I with IGFBP-1 did not improve granulation tissue deposition compared with controls.

    Outcome
    No significant changeGranulation tissue deposition
    Study

    rabbitn: not reported in source

    Rabbit ear full-thickness dermal wounds
    Comparator
    Controls
    Outcome group
    Wound healing · Skin and wound

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The same doses of IGF-I/WGD-IGFBP-1, des(1-3)IGF-I/IGFBP-1, and IGF-I/IGFBP-2 were ineffective.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Only native IGF-I in combination with native IGFBP-1 was effective as a wound healing agent, enhancing reepithelialization and granulation tissue deposition by 64+/-5 and 83+/-12% over controls (P = 0.008 and 0.016, respectively).
    Summary · context
    Full-thickness dermal wounds were created on rabbit ears; various combinations of native IGF-I, native IGFBP-1, native IGFBP-2, and their respective analogues/mutants were applied to each wound.
    Summary · context
    Wounds were harvested 7 d later for analysis.

    In this study, IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-I) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking IGF-1 DES (des(1-3)IGF-I).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    21 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    21 Oct 2026, 13:52 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.