In early postmenopausal women, calcitonin plus calcium improved bone density evolution versus calcium alone from 6 months onward (p < 0.01).
In plain wordsIn early postmenopausal women, calcitonin plus calcium preserved bone density better than calcium alone from 6 months onward.
- Peptide
- Calcitonin-salmon
- Outcome
- IncreaseLumbar bone density trajectory
- Study
n = 186
- Comparator
- Calcium alone
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
- Studied dose
- 50 IU/day, 5 days per week · intranasal · 3 yearsAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- P value for difference in BMD evolution
- < 0.01
- calcitonin plus calcium versus calcium alone
Source sentences
The difference between the evolution of the two groups was significantly (p < 0.01) different after 6 months of treatment and remained so until the end of the study.
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
The average changes in bone mineral density after 36 months showed a positive (p < 0.05) outcome (1.8 +/- 5.7%; mean +/- SD) in the group treated with salmon calcitonin and calcium and a significant (p < 0.01) loss (-5.8 +/- 4.8%) in patients receiving calcium alone.
Randomized controlled group comparison was made of 287 healthy women with 6-36 months of natural menopause and no treatment interfering with calcium metabolism at an outpatient clinic for research in bone and cartilage metabolism.
The 287 women were randomly allocated to 3 years of treatment with either 500 mg/day, 5 days/week of calcium or the same amount of calcium plus 50 IU/day, 5 days per week of nasal salmon calcitonin.