In women undergoing IVF stimulation, time for follicular development did not differ between goserelin and buserelin.
In plain wordsIn women undergoing IVF, follicular development time did not differ between goserelin and buserelin.
- Peptide
- Goserelin
- Outcome
- No significant changeTime for follicular development
- Study
n = 100
- Comparator
- Intranasal buserelin acetate
- Outcome group
- Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
- Studied dose
- 3.6 mg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).
Source sentences
There were no differences in the time required for follicular development nor in the clinical outcome between groups treated with either goserelin or buserelin.
4 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
One-hundred women undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and a human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) participated in this randomized comparative study.
The effectiveness of long-acting s.c. goserelin (Zoladex depot; 49 patients) and intranasally (i.n.) administered buserelin acetate (Suprefact; 51 patients) for pituitary down-regulation was compared.
Treatment with s.c. goserelin (3.6 mg) or i.n. buserelin acetate (200 micrograms; 6 times/day) was started on day 21-23 of the cycle.
Stimulation with 150 IU of HMG/day was started after at least 11 days of GnRH-a treatment.