Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 11 · 1994

8 results

Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I increases forearm blood flow.

Copeland KC, Nair KS

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism1 Jul 1994Cited by 55 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study8

8 results from studies that gave the peptide. 8 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In healthy volunteers, low-dose IGF-I infusion did not affect forearm blood flow compared with saline control.

    In plain wordsIn healthy volunteers, low-dose IGF-I infusion did not affect forearm blood flow compared with saline control.

    Outcome
    No significant changeForearm blood flow
    Study

    n = 11

    Comparator
    Saline control
    Outcome group
    Vascular function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    1.25 micrograms/kg BW.h · intraarterial · 90 minAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Likewise, the low dose arterial IGF-I infusion had no effect on blood flow, even though deep venous IGF-I concentrations increased slightly (127 +/- 37 to 172 +/- 19 ng/mL; P = NS).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Eleven healthy volunteers (10 males and 1 female) underwent brachial arterial and deep forearm venous catheterizations to evaluate the effects of an intraarterial infusion of IGF-I on blood flow.
    Summary · context
    Saline was infused into the brachial artery for 1 h, followed by infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (1.25, then 10 micrograms/kg BW.h) over 2 subsequent 90-min periods.
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialPharmacokinetics

    In healthy volunteers, the slight increase in deep venous IGF-I with low-dose infusion was not significant compared with saline control.

    In plain wordsIn healthy volunteers, the slight increase in deep venous IGF-I with low-dose infusion was not significant compared with saline control.

    Outcome
    No significant changeDeep venous IGF-I
    Study

    n = 11

    Comparator
    Saline control
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    1.25 micrograms/kg BW.h · intraarterial · 90 minAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Deep venous IGF-I
    127 ng/mL
    before low-dose infusion
    Deep venous IGF-I
    172 ng/mL
    during low-dose infusion (1.25 micrograms/kg BW.h), P = NS
    Reported +/- term for deep venous IGF-I
    37 ng/mL
    before low-dose infusion; uncertainty type not stated
    Reported +/- term for deep venous IGF-I
    19 ng/mL
    during low-dose infusion; uncertainty type not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Likewise, the low dose arterial IGF-I infusion had no effect on blood flow, even though deep venous IGF-I concentrations increased slightly (127 +/- 37 to 172 +/- 19 ng/mL; P = NS).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Eleven healthy volunteers (10 males and 1 female) underwent brachial arterial and deep forearm venous catheterizations to evaluate the effects of an intraarterial infusion of IGF-I on blood flow.
    Summary · context
    Saline was infused into the brachial artery for 1 h, followed by infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (1.25, then 10 micrograms/kg BW.h) over 2 subsequent 90-min periods.
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialPharmacokinetics

    In healthy volunteers, high-dose IGF-I infusion increased deep venous IGF-I approximately 4-fold above control values.

    In plain wordsIn healthy volunteers, high-dose IGF-I infusion increased deep venous IGF-I approximately 4-fold above control values.

    Outcome
    IncreaseDeep venous IGF-I
    Study

    n = 11

    Comparator
    Saline control
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 micrograms/kg.h · intraarterial · 90 minAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Deep venous IGF-I
    477 ng/mL
    10 micrograms/kg.h infusion
    Deep venous IGF-I
    150 ng/mL
    control
    Deep venous IGF-I fold increase
    ≈ 4 fold
    above control values
    Reported +/- term for deep venous IGF-I
    80 ng/mL
    10 micrograms/kg.h infusion; uncertainty type not stated
    Reported +/- term for deep venous IGF-I
    27 ng/mL
    control; uncertainty type not stated
    P value for deep venous IGF-I concentration
    < 0.0001 unitless
    10 micrograms/kg.h infusion versus control

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The 10 micrograms/kg.h infusion rate increased deep venous IGF-I concentrations approximately 4-fold above control values (477 +/- 80 vs. 150 +/- 27 ng/mL, respectively; P < 0.0001)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Eleven healthy volunteers (10 males and 1 female) underwent brachial arterial and deep forearm venous catheterizations to evaluate the effects of an intraarterial infusion of IGF-I on blood flow.
    Summary · context
    Saline was infused into the brachial artery for 1 h, followed by infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (1.25, then 10 micrograms/kg BW.h) over 2 subsequent 90-min periods.
  4. 04HumanNon-randomized trialPharmacokinetics

    In healthy volunteers, high-dose IGF-I infusion increased peripheral IGF-I approximately 2-fold above control values.

    In plain wordsIn healthy volunteers, high-dose IGF-I infusion increased peripheral IGF-I approximately 2-fold above control values.

    Outcome
    IncreasePeripheral IGF-I
    Study

    n = 11

    Comparator
    Saline control
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    10 micrograms/kg.h · intraarterial · 90 minAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Peripheral IGF-I
    299 ng/mL
    10 micrograms/kg.h infusion
    Peripheral IGF-I fold increase
    ≈ 2 fold
    above control values
    Reported +/- term for peripheral IGF-I
    50 ng/mL
    10 micrograms/kg.h infusion; uncertainty type not stated
    P value for peripheral IGF-I concentration
    < 0.0001 unitless
    10 micrograms/kg.h infusion versus control

    Source sentences

    Summary
    whereas IGF-I concentrations in the peripheral circulation were increased approximately 2-fold (299 +/- 50 ng/mL) above control values (P < 0.0001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Eleven healthy volunteers (10 males and 1 female) underwent brachial arterial and deep forearm venous catheterizations to evaluate the effects of an intraarterial infusion of IGF-I on blood flow.
    Summary · context
    Saline was infused into the brachial artery for 1 h, followed by infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (1.25, then 10 micrograms/kg BW.h) over 2 subsequent 90-min periods.
  5. 05HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In healthy volunteers, neither IGF-I dose influenced arteriovenous glucose differences compared with saline control.

    In plain wordsIn healthy volunteers, neither IGF-I dose influenced arteriovenous glucose differences compared with saline control.

    Outcome
    No significant changeArteriovenous glucose difference
    Study

    n = 11

    Comparator
    Saline control
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.25 or 10 micrograms/kg BW.h · intraarterial · 90 minAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Arteriovenous glucose differences, peripheral glucose concentrations, and binding protein-3 concentrations were not influenced by either dose of IGF-I.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Eleven healthy volunteers (10 males and 1 female) underwent brachial arterial and deep forearm venous catheterizations to evaluate the effects of an intraarterial infusion of IGF-I on blood flow.
    Summary · context
    Saline was infused into the brachial artery for 1 h, followed by infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (1.25, then 10 micrograms/kg BW.h) over 2 subsequent 90-min periods.
  6. 06HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In healthy volunteers, neither IGF-I dose influenced peripheral glucose concentrations compared with saline control.

    In plain wordsIn healthy volunteers, neither IGF-I dose influenced peripheral glucose concentrations compared with saline control.

    Outcome
    No significant changePeripheral glucose
    Study

    n = 11

    Comparator
    Saline control
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.25 or 10 micrograms/kg BW.h · intraarterial · 90 minAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Arteriovenous glucose differences, peripheral glucose concentrations, and binding protein-3 concentrations were not influenced by either dose of IGF-I.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Eleven healthy volunteers (10 males and 1 female) underwent brachial arterial and deep forearm venous catheterizations to evaluate the effects of an intraarterial infusion of IGF-I on blood flow.
    Summary · context
    Saline was infused into the brachial artery for 1 h, followed by infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (1.25, then 10 micrograms/kg BW.h) over 2 subsequent 90-min periods.
  7. 07HumanNon-randomized trialMechanism

    In healthy volunteers, neither IGF-I dose influenced binding protein-3 concentrations compared with saline control.

    In plain wordsIn healthy volunteers, neither IGF-I dose influenced binding protein-3 concentrations compared with saline control.

    Outcome
    No significant changeBinding protein-3
    Study

    n = 11

    Comparator
    Saline control
    Outcome group
    Growth hormone and IGF-1 · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.25 or 10 micrograms/kg BW.h · intraarterial · 90 minAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Arteriovenous glucose differences, peripheral glucose concentrations, and binding protein-3 concentrations were not influenced by either dose of IGF-I.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Eleven healthy volunteers (10 males and 1 female) underwent brachial arterial and deep forearm venous catheterizations to evaluate the effects of an intraarterial infusion of IGF-I on blood flow.
    Summary · context
    Saline was infused into the brachial artery for 1 h, followed by infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (1.25, then 10 micrograms/kg BW.h) over 2 subsequent 90-min periods.
  8. 08HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In healthy volunteers, high-dose IGF-I was associated with a 68% increase in forearm blood flow versus control.

    In plain wordsIn healthy volunteers, high-dose IGF-I increased forearm blood flow by 68% versus control.

    Outcome
    IncreaseForearm blood flow
    Study

    n = 11

    Comparator
    Saline control
    Outcome group
    Vascular function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    10 micrograms/kg.h · intraarterial · 90 minAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Forearm blood flow
    71 mL/min
    10 micrograms/kg.h IGF-I
    Forearm blood flow
    42 mL/min
    control
    Forearm blood flow increase
    68%
    10 micrograms/kg.h IGF-I versus control
    Reported +/- term for forearm blood flow
    8 mL/min
    10 micrograms/kg.h IGF-I; uncertainty type not stated
    Reported +/- term for forearm blood flow
    6 mL/min
    control; uncertainty type not stated
    P value for forearm blood flow
    < 0.0004 unitless
    10 micrograms/kg.h IGF-I versus control

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The 10 micrograms/kg.h dose of IGF-I was associated with a 68% increase in forearm blood flow (71 +/- 8 vs. 42 +/- 6 mL/min, respectively; P < 0.0004).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Eleven healthy volunteers (10 males and 1 female) underwent brachial arterial and deep forearm venous catheterizations to evaluate the effects of an intraarterial infusion of IGF-I on blood flow.
    Summary · context
    Saline was infused into the brachial artery for 1 h, followed by infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (1.25, then 10 micrograms/kg BW.h) over 2 subsequent 90-min periods.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    14 Oct 2026, 05:02 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    14 Oct 2026, 01:46 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.