Skip to content

Study · Animal study (in vivo) · rat · 1993

6 results

Role of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in pathogenesis of ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats.

Karmeli F, Eliakim R, Okon E, Rachmilewitz D

Digestive diseases and sciences1 Jul 1993Cited by 4 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study6

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. No result from this study comes from people.

  1. 01AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Safety outcome

    In rats given intragastric ethanol, coadministered VIP doubled the mean gastric lesion area compared with ethanol alone.

    In plain wordsIn rats, VIP given with ethanol doubled the stomach damage compared with ethanol alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseEthanol-induced gastric lesion area
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    rats with ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage
    Comparator
    Ethanol alone
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal protection · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    1 nmol/liter to 1 mumol/liter/100 g · intravenous or intraperitoneal coadministration with intragastric ethanolAs given in this study (rat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    VIP was found to double the mean lesion area when compared with that induced by ethanol alone (P < 0.05), an effect that was prevented by VIP antagonist (1 mumol/liter/100 g).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To elucidate the possible role of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in the pathogenesis of acute gastric mucosal damage, rats were treated intragastrically with 1.0 ml 96% ethanol with or without intravenous or intraperitoneal coadministration of VIP (1 nmol/liter to 1 mumol/liter/100 g).
  2. 02AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Mechanism

    In rats, the increase in ethanol-induced gastric damage by VIP was associated with higher gastric mucosal LTB4 levels.

    In plain wordsIn rats, the added stomach damage from VIP with ethanol went together with higher LTB4 levels in the stomach lining.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastric mucosal LTB4 level with VIP and ethanol
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    rats with ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    1 nmol/liter to 1 mumol/liter/100 g · intravenous or intraperitoneal coadministration with intragastric ethanolAs given in this study (rat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The augmentation of ethanol-induced damage by VIP was associated with increased gastric mucosal levels of LTB4.
  3. 03AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Mechanism

    In VIP-treated rats, gastric mucosal substance P levels were significantly higher than in control rats.

    In plain wordsIn rats, VIP treatment raised substance P levels in the stomach lining compared with control rats.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastric mucosal substance P level after VIP
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    rats with ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage
    Comparator
    Control rats
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In VIP-treated rats, gastric mucosal levels of substance P were found to be significantly increased compared with control rats (P < 0.05).
  4. 04AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In pyloric-ligated rats, VIP significantly increased gastric acid output compared with saline.

    In plain wordsIn rats, VIP increased stomach acid output compared with saline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastric acid output in pyloric-ligated rats
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    pyloric-ligated rats
    Comparator
    Saline
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal protection · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Administration of VIP to pyloric-ligated rats significantly increased gastric acid output and blood pepsinogen A levels as compared with saline treated rats (P < 0.05).
  5. 05AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In pyloric-ligated rats, VIP significantly increased blood pepsinogen A levels compared with saline.

    In plain wordsIn rats, VIP raised blood pepsinogen A levels compared with saline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseBlood pepsinogen A level in pyloric-ligated rats
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    pyloric-ligated rats
    Comparator
    Saline
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal protection · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Administration of VIP to pyloric-ligated rats significantly increased gastric acid output and blood pepsinogen A levels as compared with saline treated rats (P < 0.05).

Natural levels measured1

These results measure the body's own peptide. Nobody was given the peptide. They are not evidence about taking it. They are left out of key results, evidence counts and charts.

  1. 06AnimalEndogenous levelAnimal study (in vivo)Mechanism

    In rats, ethanol treatment significantly increased gastric mucosal VIP levels compared with saline treatment.

    In plain wordsIn rats, ethanol raised the body's own VIP level in the stomach lining compared with saline.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastric mucosal VIP level after ethanol
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    rats with ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage
    Comparator
    Saline-treated rats
    Outcome group
    Endogenous peptide levels · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastric mucosal levels of LTB4, LTC4, VIP, and substance P were significantly increased in ethanol-treated rats as compared with saline-treated animals (P < 0.05).

    This result measures the body's own Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil). Nobody was given the peptide. It is not evidence about taking it.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:58 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 12:41 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.