Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 25 · 1982

2 results

A double-blind controlled trial of salmon calcitonin in pain due to malignancy.

Hindley AC, Hill EB, Leyland MJ, Wiles AE

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology1 Jan 1982Cited by 24 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In malignancy-associated pain, improvement or marked improvement occurred in 5/13 calcitonin recipients versus 0/12 placebo recipients at one week (P = 0.0484).

    In plain wordsIn cancer pain, improvement occurred more often with salmon calcitonin than placebo at one week.

    Outcome
    IncreasePain response at one week
    Study

    n = 25

    Comparator
    Matching placebo
    Outcome group
    Pain · Nervous system and cognition
    Studied dose
    200 UI 6-hourly · subcutaneous · 48 hAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Pain responders
    5 patients
    calcitonin
    Evaluated patients
    13 patients
    calcitonin
    Pain responders
    0 patients
    placebo
    Evaluated patients
    12 patients
    placebo
    P
    0.0484
    Fisher exact two-tailed test

    Source sentences

    Summary
    One week after commencing therapy there was improvement or marked improvement of pain in significantly more patients in the calcitonin group (5/13) than in the placebo group (0/12) (Fisher's exact two-tailed probability test, P = 0.0484).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Thirty-two patients with established malignancy and associated pain participated in a randomised double-blind controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    They received salmon calcitonin SC 200 UI or matching placebo 6-hourly for 48 h and were assessed by using a combination of a 20-point visual analogue scale (VAS), a 4-point physician's global pain scale, and ranking of the co-administered analgesics into 20 grades of potency.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-five patients (13 calcitonin, 12 placebo) were evaluated.
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In malignancy-associated pain, three calcitonin recipients still showed marked pain improvement at the end of the second week.

    In plain wordsIn cancer pain, three salmon calcitonin recipients still showed marked pain improvement at the end of the second week.

    Outcome
    IncreasePersistent marked pain improvement at second week
    Study

    n = 13

    Outcome group
    Pain · Nervous system and cognition
    Studied dose
    200 UI 6-hourly · subcutaneous · 48 hAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Persistent marked improvement
    3 patients
    calcitonin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At the end of the second week three patients in the calcitonin group were still showing marked improvement.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Thirty-two patients with established malignancy and associated pain participated in a randomised double-blind controlled trial.
    Summary · context
    They received salmon calcitonin SC 200 UI or matching placebo 6-hourly for 48 h and were assessed by using a combination of a 20-point visual analogue scale (VAS), a 4-point physician's global pain scale, and ranking of the co-administered analgesics into 20 grades of potency.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-five patients (13 calcitonin, 12 placebo) were evaluated.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.