Skip to content

Study · Measured the body's own peptide · 1984

1 result

Immunohistochemical evidence against the coexistence of a corticotropin-releasing factor and oxytocin or vasopressin in the rat paraventricular nucleus.

Taniguchi Y

Archivum histologicum Japonicum = Nihon soshikigaku kiroku1 Nov 1984Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Natural levels measured1

These results measure the body's own peptide. Nobody was given the peptide. They are not evidence about taking it. They are left out of key results, evidence counts and charts.

  1. 01LabEndogenous levelEx vivo tissueMechanism

    In colchicine-treated male rat paraventricular nucleus sections, endogenous oxytocin and corticotropin-releasing factor did not coexist in the same neuron.

    In plain wordsIn treated male rat brain sections, the body's own oxytocin and corticotropin-releasing factor were not found in the same neuron.

    Peptide
    Oxytocin
    Outcome
    Not applicableOxytocin and corticotropin-releasing factor coexistence in neurons
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    paraventricular nucleus cryostat sections
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Endocrine and hormones

    Source sentences

    Summary
    By comparing the distribution of CRF and oxytocin or vasopressin on serial 5 micron cryostat sections, it was revealed that CRF and oxytocin or CRF and vasopressin do not coexist in the same neuron.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), oxytocin and arginine-vasopressin were localized immunohistochemically in the paraventricular nucleus of colchicine-treated male rats.

    This result measures the body's own Oxytocin. Nobody was given the peptide. It is not evidence about taking it.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 20:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:52 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.